ReviewClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022
Statistical Considerations for Analyses of Time-To-Event Endpoints in Oncology Clinical Trials: Illustrations with CAR-T Immunotherapy Studies.
Review in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Statistical Methods for Chimeric Antigen Receptor Cell Therapy Outcomes: A Review and Practical Considerations.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2026Review
- Landmark-Based Evaluations of Long-Term Outcomes After CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy in Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2026Article
- Strategies to address non-proportional hazards between survival curves - Lessons from phase III trials in hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of hepatology · 2026Article
- Novel R Shiny Tool for Survival Analysis With Time-Varying Covariate in Oncology Studies: Overcoming Biases and Enhancing Collaboration.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2026Article
- Poor olfaction and risk of heart failure in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025Article
- Hazards Constitute Key Quantities for Analyzing, Interpreting and Understanding Time-to-Event Data.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2025Review
- Inconsistent Reporting and Definitions of Time-to-Event Endpoints in CAR T Clinical Trials: A Review.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2025Review
- Olfactory Impairment and the Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Older Adults.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Intention-to-treat outcomes utilising a stringent event definition in children and young people treated with tisagenlecleucel for r/r ALL through a national access scheme.Blood cancer journal · 2024Article
- Article
- INSPIRED Symposium Part 1: Clinical Variables Associated with Improved Outcomes for Children and Young Adults treated with Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cells for B cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2023Review
- Endpoint selection and evaluation in hematology studies.Best practice & research. Clinical haematology · 2023Review
- Novel Insights into Fungal Infections Prophylaxis and Treatment in Pediatric Patients with Cancer.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is an exciting development in the field of cancer immunology and has received a lot of interest in recent years. Many time-to-event (TTE) endpoints related to relapse, disease progression, and remission are analyzed in CAR-T studies to assess treatment efficacy. Definitions of these TTE endpoints are not always consistent, even for the same outcomes (e.g., progression-free survival), which often stems from analysis choices regarding which events to consider as part of the composite endpoint, censoring or competing risk in the analysis. Subsequent therapies such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are common but are not treated the same in different studies. Standard survival analysis methods are commonly applied to TTE analyses but often without full consideration of the assumptions inherent in the chosen analysis. We highlight two important issues of TTE analysis that arise in CAR-T studies, as well as in other settings in oncology: the handling of competing risks and assessing the association between a time-varying (post-infusion) exposure and the TTE outcome. We review existing analytical methods, including the cumulative incidence function and regression models for analysis of competing risks, and landmark and time-varying covariate analysis for analysis of post-infusion exposures. We clarify the scientific questions that the different analytical approaches address and illustrate how the application of an inappropriate method could lead to different results using data from multiple published CAR-T studies. Codes for implementing these methods in standard statistical software are provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.