ArticleJournal of vision2022
Visual search training benefits from the integrative effect of enhanced covert attention and optimized overt eye movements.
Article in Journal of vision, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceptual learning enhances diabetic retinopathy detection skills in novice optometry students.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Perceptual Decision Efficiency and Optimal Sleep Quality Are Associated with Female College Soccer Injury Avoidance.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Task-Based EEG Neurofeedback Enhances Training Effects in Dynamic Visual Search.Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Training serves as an effective approach to improve visual search performance when the target does not automatically pop out from the distractors. In the present study, we trained participants on a conjunction visual search task and examined the training effects in behavior and eye movement. The results of Experiments 1 to 4 showed that training improved behavioral performance and reduced the number of saccades and overall scanning time. Training also increased the search initiation time before the first saccade and the proportion of trials in which the participants correctly identified the target without any saccade, but these effects were modulated by stimulus' parameters. In Experiment 5, we simultaneously recorded eye movements and electroencephalography signals and the results revealed significant N2 posterior contralateral (N2pc) components after the stimulus onset (i.e., stimulus-locked) and before the first saccade (i.e., saccade-locked) when the search target was the trained one. These N2pc components can be considered as the neural signatures for the enhanced covert attention to the trained target. Together with the training-induced increase in functional visual field, these mechanisms could support the beneficial effects of increased search initiation time and reduced number of saccades. These findings suggest that visual search training enhanced covert attention to target and optimized overt eye movements to facilitate search performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.