ReviewCurrent opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care2022
Assessment of human milk in the era of precision health.
Review in Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of processing techniques on donor human milk: a multi-omics and bioinformatics scoping review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Associations among Human Milk Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and Infant Sleep Patterns: A Cross-Sectional Study.The Journal of nutrition · 2025Article
- An Automated Workflow Composition System for Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Metabolomics Data Processing.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2023Article
- Untargeted Metabolomic Analysis of Lactation-Stage-Matched Human and Bovine Milk Samples at 2 Weeks Postnatal.Nutrients · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewPrecision health provides an unprecedented opportunity to improve the assessment of infant nutrition and health outcomes. Breastfeeding is positively associated with infant health outcomes, yet only 58.3% of children born in 2017 were still breastfeeding at 6 months. There is an urgent need to examine the application of precision health tools that support the development of public health interventions focused on improving breastfeeding outcomes. RECENT
findingsIn this review, we discussed the novel and highly sensitive techniques that can provide a vast amount of omics data and clinical information just by evaluating small volumes of milk samples, such as RNA sequencing, cytometry by time-of-flight, and human milk analyzer for clinical implementation. These advanced techniques can run multiple samples in a short period of time making them ideal for the routine clinical evaluation of milk samples. SUMMARY: Precision health tools are increasingly used in clinical research studies focused on infant nutrition. The integration of routinely collected multiomics human milk data within the electronic health records has the potential to identify molecular biomarkers associated with infant health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.