Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35838293›Full record

SynthesisActa psychiatrica Scandinavica2022

Clinical practice guidelines with recommendations for peripartum depression: A European systematic review.

Emma Motrico, Patricia Moreno-Peral, Kristiina Uriko, Camellia Hancheva, Maja Brekalo, Erilda Ajaz, Gisele Apter, Alessandra Bramante, Sonia Conejo-Cerón, Andri Christoforou and 9 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Clinical practice guidelines for the nutrition of colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Emma MotricoDepartment of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucia, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0720-567X
Patricia Moreno-PeralInstitute of Biomedical Research in Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Kristiina UrikoDepartment of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Tallinn University, Estonia.
Camellia HanchevaSofia University St Kliment Ochridski, Bulgaria.
Maja BrekaloCatholic University of Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia.
Erilda AjazDepartment of Education Sciences and Psychology, Beder College University, Tirana, Albania.
Gisele ApterPerinatal and Child Psychiatry, Le Havre Hospital, Normandie University Rouen, France.
Alessandra BramantePolicentro Donna Ambulatory, Milan, Italy.
Sonia Conejo-CerónInstitute of Biomedical Research in Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Andri ChristoforouDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Pelin Dikmen-YildizDepartment of Psychology, Kirklareli University, Kirklareli, Turkey.
Olympia EvagorouDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Ana FonsecaCenter for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive and Behavioral Intervention (CINEICC), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Angela LupattelliDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Sandra Nakić RadošCatholic University of Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia.
Nadia Al MaachDepartment of Psychiatry and Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
María F Rodriguez-MuñozDepartment of Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid, Spain.
Maja ŽutićCatholic University of Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia.
Mijke P Lambregtse-van den BergDepartment of Psychiatry and Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to systematically review all Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) with recommendations for peripartum depression in European countries.

methodsA systematic review according to the PRISMA statement was conducted. CPGs focussing on peripartum depression or with at least one specific recommendation for peripartum depression from European countries were selected. Searching was conducted in electronic databases (MEDLINE and PsycINFO), and by contacting professional societies and international experts until November 24th, 2021. Characteristics of the included CPGs and their recommendations were extracted. A methodological quality assessment was conducted using the AGREE-II tool.

resultsA total of 239 records were identified after duplicate removal. Of these, 54 were examined for full-text inspection. The final selection yielded 14 CPGs from 11 European countries in 10 languages. Of them, 11 provided recommendations on pharmacological treatments, 10 on psychological treatment (e.g., cognitive-behavioural therapy), 10 on screening, 8 on diagnosis, 6 on other treatments (e.g., physical exercise), 5 on prevention, and 5 other recommendations (e.g., provide information). Regarding the overall methodological quality, only five (35.7%) guidelines were rated as of adequate quality, reaching a score ≥ 70% in the overall assessment of the AGREE-II instrument. Of the six AGREE-II domains, applicability scored the lowest and clarity of presentation scored the highest.

conclusionThe absence of CPGs in most European countries, the discrepancy in recommendations and the low methodological quality of the guidelines may lead to disparities and inequalities in peripartum depression management in Europe. The COST Action Riseup-PPD highlights key considerations for future guideline developers.

Indexed as

DepressionPeripartum PeriodDatabases, FactualEuropeExerciseHumansclinical practice guidelinesdepressionperinatalperipartumsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35838293
PMCPMC9805017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.