ArticleHealth information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia2024
International Classification of Diseases clinical coding training: An international survey.
Article in Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Australia, 2010-2022: A Population-Based Study Using Linked National Administrative Health Data.Arthritis care & research · 2026Article
- Extracting Medical Information From Unstructured Clinical Text Using Large Language Models to Enhance Health Care Interoperability: Proof-of-Concept Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Accuracy of administrative data in ascertaining health conditions: a systematic review.JAMIA open · 2026Review
- Factors associated with clinical coders' intention to use the international classification of diseases 11th revision (ICD-11): a cross-sectional study in Iran.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Trends, inequalities, and 2030 projections of women's tracheal, bronchial, and lung cancer attributable to air pollution, radon, and tobacco exposure.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
- How does the mapped ICD data in an EHR system compare to the hospital DAD data in Alberta, Canada?BMC health services research · 2025Article
- A Review of the Evidence of the Toxicity of Chemical Substances Included in the European Union Ambient Air Quality and Drinking Water Directives: Perspectives for Health Impact Assessments.Environment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
- Article
- Application of Clinical Department-Specific AI-Assisted Coding Using Taiwan Diagnosis-Related Groups: Retrospective Validation Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Stroke clinical coding education program in Australia and New Zealand.Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Automated clinical coding: what, why, and where we are?NPJ digital medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe International Classification of Diseases (ICD) is widely used by clinical coders worldwide for clinical coding morbidity data into administrative health databases. Accordingly, hospital data quality largely depends on the coders' skills acquired during ICD training, which varies greatly across countries.
objectiveTo characterise the current landscape of international ICD clinical coding training.
methodAn online questionnaire was created to survey the 194 World Health Organization (WHO) member countries. Questions focused on the training provided to clinical coding professionals. The survey was distributed to potential participants who met specific criteria, and to organisations specialised in the topic, such as WHO Collaborating Centres, to be forwarded to their representatives. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics.
resultsData from 47 respondents from 26 countries revealed disparities in all inquired topics. However, most participants reported clinical coders as the primary person assigning ICD codes. Although training was available in all countries, some did not mandate training qualifications, and those that did differed in type and duration of training, with college or university degree being most common. Clinical coding certificates most frequently entailed passing a certification exam. Most countries offered continuing training opportunities, and provided a range of support resources for clinical coders.
conclusionVariability in clinical coder training could affect data collection worldwide, thus potentially hindering international comparability of health data. IMPLICATIONS: These findings could encourage countries to improve their resources and training programs available for clinical coders and will ultimately be valuable to the WHO for the standardisation of ICD training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.