Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35837650›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

Using Facial Micro-Expressions in Combination With EEG and Physiological Signals for Emotion Recognition.

Nastaran Saffaryazdi, Syed Talal Wasim, Kuldeep Dileep, Alireza Farrokhi Nia, Suranga Nanayakkara, Elizabeth Broadbent, Mark Billinghurst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nastaran SaffaryazdiEmpathic Computing Laboratory, Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Syed Talal WasimEmpathic Computing Laboratory, Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Kuldeep DileepEmpathic Computing Laboratory, Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Alireza Farrokhi NiaEmpathic Computing Laboratory, Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Suranga NanayakkaraAugmented Human Laboratory, Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Elizabeth BroadbentDepartment of Psychological Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Mark BillinghurstEmpathic Computing Laboratory, Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotions are multimodal processes that play a crucial role in our everyday lives. Recognizing emotions is becoming more critical in a wide range of application domains such as healthcare, education, human-computer interaction, Virtual Reality, intelligent agents, entertainment, and more. Facial macro-expressions or intense facial expressions are the most common modalities in recognizing emotional states. However, since facial expressions can be voluntarily controlled, they may not accurately represent emotional states. Earlier studies have shown that facial micro-expressions are more reliable than facial macro-expressions for revealing emotions. They are subtle, involuntary movements responding to external stimuli that cannot be controlled. This paper proposes using facial micro-expressions combined with brain and physiological signals to more reliably detect underlying emotions. We describe our models for measuring arousal and valence levels from a combination of facial micro-expressions, Electroencephalography (EEG) signals, galvanic skin responses (GSR), and Photoplethysmography (PPG) signals. We then evaluate our model using the DEAP dataset and our own dataset based on a subject-independent approach. Lastly, we discuss our results, the limitations of our work, and how these limitations could be overcome. We also discuss future directions for using facial micro-expressions and physiological signals in emotion recognition.

Indexed as

decision fusionelectroencephalography (EEG)emotion recognitionfacial micro-expressionsneural networksOpenBCIphysiological signals

Identifiers

PMID35837650
PMCPMC9275379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.