Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35837551›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022

CRISPR/Cas- and Topical RNAi-Based Technologies for Crop Management and Improvement: Reviewing the Risk Assessment and Challenges Towards a More Sustainable Agriculture.

Fabiano Touzdjian Pinheiro Kohlrausch Távora, Francisco de Assis Dos Santos Diniz, Camila de Moraes Rêgo-Machado, Natália Chagas Freitas, Fabrício Barbosa Monteiro Arraes, Eduardo Chumbinho de Andrade, Leila Lourenço Furtado, Karen Ofuji Osiro, Natália Lima de Sousa, Thiago Bérgamo Cardoso and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. RNA silencing: the future potential strategy for engineering virus resistance in plants.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. GMOs or non-GMOs? The CRISPR Conundrum.Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Fabiano Touzdjian Pinheiro Kohlrausch TávoraDepartment of Phytopathology, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Francisco de Assis Dos Santos DinizDepartment of Phytopathology, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Camila de Moraes Rêgo-MachadoDepartment of Phytopathology, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Natália Chagas FreitasEmbrapa Agroenergy, Brasília, Brazil.
Fabrício Barbosa Monteiro ArraesEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília, Brazil.
Eduardo Chumbinho de AndradeEmbrapa Cassava and Fruits, Cruz Das Almas, Brazil.
Leila Lourenço FurtadoDepartment of Phytopathology, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Karen Ofuji OsiroDepartment of Phytopathology, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Natália Lima de SousaIPADS-Balcarce (UEDD INTA-CONICET), Balcarce, Argentina.
Thiago Bérgamo CardosoSEMPRE AgTech, Chapecó, Brazil.
Liliane Márcia Mertz HenningEmbrapa Soybean, Londrina, Brazil.
Patrícia Abrão de Oliveira MolinariEmbrapa Agroenergy, Brasília, Brazil.
Sérgio Enrique FeingoldIPADS-Balcarce (UEDD INTA-CONICET), Balcarce, Argentina.
Wayne B HunterUSDA-ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory, Fort Pierce, FL, United States.
Maria Fátima Grossi de SáEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília, Brazil.
Adilson Kenji KobayashiEmbrapa Agroenergy, Brasília, Brazil.
Alexandre Lima NepomucenoEmbrapa Soybean, Londrina, Brazil.
Thaís Ribeiro SantiagoDepartment of Phytopathology, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Hugo Bruno Correa MolinariSEMPRE AgTech, Chapecó, Brazil.
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BRConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARU.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated gene (Cas) system and RNA interference (RNAi)-based non-transgenic approaches are powerful technologies capable of revolutionizing plant research and breeding. In recent years, the use of these modern technologies has been explored in various sectors of agriculture, introducing or improving important agronomic traits in plant crops, such as increased yield, nutritional quality, abiotic- and, mostly, biotic-stress resistance. However, the limitations of each technique, public perception, and regulatory aspects are hindering its wide adoption for the development of new crop varieties or products. In an attempt to reverse these mishaps, scientists have been researching alternatives to increase the specificity, uptake, and stability of the CRISPR and RNAi system components in the target organism, as well as to reduce the chance of toxicity in nontarget organisms to minimize environmental risk, health problems, and regulatory issues. In this review, we discuss several aspects related to risk assessment, toxicity, and advances in the use of CRISPR/Cas and topical RNAi-based technologies in crop management and breeding. The present study also highlights the advantages and possible drawbacks of each technology, provides a brief overview of how to circumvent the off-target occurrence, the strategies to increase on-target specificity, the harm/benefits of association with nanotechnology, the public perception of the available techniques, worldwide regulatory frameworks regarding topical RNAi and CRISPR technologies, and, lastly, presents successful case studies of biotechnological solutions derived from both technologies, raising potential challenges to reach the market and being social and environmentally safe.

Indexed as

exogenous dsRNAgene silencinggenome editingnanotechnologyofftargetspublic acceptanceregulatory aspectstoxicity

Identifiers

PMID35837551
PMCPMC9274005
OpenAlexW4283641694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.