ArticleFood safety (Tokyo, Japan)2022
Focusing Points on FSCJ's Guideline Recently Established: Risk Assessment of Food Contact Materials.
Article in Food safety (Tokyo, Japan), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Japan, the Positive List (PL) system was introduced (Enforcement: June 1, 2020) in the regulative field of Food Apparatus, Containers, and Packaging (ACP) by the recent amendment of the Food Sanitation Act. Under this situation, continuous requests for the risk assessments from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) to the Food Safety Commission of Japan (FSCJ) will be expected. To enhance fairness and transparency and to clarify the data required for the risk assessment, the FSCJ established its "Guidelines for the Risk Assessment of Food Apparatus, Containers, and Packaging" on May 28, 2019. The Guidelines apply to new Food Contact Materials or Substances (FCMs) after enforcement of the PL system (June 1, 2020). The subject material is synthetic resins, because the PL system was first introduced to them in Japan. In general, the substances that are migrated from ACP are not intended to migrate into foods, and their technological effects on foods are not expected. It can be supposed that the migration of these substances is generally very limited. Therefore, as adopted in the USA and the EU, the Guidelines also adopt the tiered approach for the toxicological data requirement that depend on the estimated migration levels (Tier of Dietary Concentration (Tier of DC)) on the subject substance. The greater the exposure to the substance through migration, the more toxicity test results will be needed. The risk assessment steps by the tiered approach in the Guidelines are (1) migration assessment, (2) toxicity assessment, (3) exposure assessment, and (4) risk characterization. These steps are aimed to harmonize with the general 4 steps of risk assessments: hazard identification, hazard characterization, exposure assessment, and risk characterization. In this review, we will introduce the overview of the Guidelines and details of the above 4 steps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.