Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35837454›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Combining NDVI and Bacterial Blight Score to Predict Grain Yield in Field Pea.

Huanhuan Zhao, Babu R Pandey, Majid Khansefid, Hossein V Khahrood, Shimna Sudheesh, Sameer Joshi, Surya Kant, Sukhjiwan Kaur, Garry M Rosewarne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Huanhuan ZhaoAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for Agri Bioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Babu R PandeyAgriculture Victoria, Grains Innovation Park, Horsham, VIC, Australia.
Majid KhansefidAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for Agri Bioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Hossein V KhahroodAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for Agri Bioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Shimna SudheeshAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for Agri Bioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Sameer JoshiAgriculture Victoria, Grains Innovation Park, Horsham, VIC, Australia.
Surya KantAgriculture Victoria, Grains Innovation Park, Horsham, VIC, Australia.
Sukhjiwan KaurAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for Agri Bioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Garry M RosewarneAgriculture Victoria, Grains Innovation Park, Horsham, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Field pea is the most commonly grown temperate pulse crop, with close to 15 million tons produced globally in 2020. Varieties improved through breeding are important to ensure ongoing improvements in yield and disease resistance. Genomic selection (GS) is a modern breeding approach that could substantially improve the rate of genetic gain for grain yield, and its deployment depends on the prediction accuracy (PA) that can be achieved. In our study, four yield trials representing breeding lines' advancement stages of the breeding program (S0, S1, S2, and S3) were assessed with grain yield, aerial high-throughput phenotyping (normalized difference vegetation index, NDVI), and bacterial blight disease scores (BBSC). Low-to-moderate broad-sense heritability (0.31-0.71) and narrow-sense heritability (0.13-0.71) were observed, as the estimated additive and non-additive genetic components for the three traits varied with the different models fitted. The genetic correlations among the three traits were high, particularly in the S0-S2 stages. NDVI and BBSC were combined to investigate the PA for grain yield by univariate and multivariate GS models, and multivariate models showed higher PA than univariate models in both cross-validation and forward prediction methods. A 6-50% improvement in PA was achieved when multivariate models were deployed. The highest PA was indicated in the forward prediction scenario when the training population consisted of early generation breeding stages with the multivariate models. Both NDVI and BBSC are commonly used traits that could be measured in the early growth stage; however, our study suggested that NDVI is a more useful trait to predict grain yield with high accuracy in the field pea breeding program, especially in diseased trials, through its incorporation into multivariate models.

Indexed as

bacteria blightfield peagenomic predictiongrain yieldmultivariate modelNDVI

Identifiers

PMID35837454
PMCPMC9274273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.