ArticleWorld journal of oncology2022
Abdominopelvic Lymphatic Drainage Area Irradiation for Consolidative Radiotherapy of Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma: Analysis of Clinical Application Efficacy and Dosimetric Verification.
Article in World journal of oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inhibiting the mWorld journal of oncology · 2024Article
- Is Prophylactic Radiotherapy to the Lymphatic Drainage Area Necessary for Patients With Stage III Ovarian Cancer After Chemotherapy Following Surgery?Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of abdominopelvic lymphatic drainage area irradiation (APLN), instead of whole abdominal radiotherapy (WART), in the consolidative radiotherapy of advanced ovarian carcinoma patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis collecting 99 patients with locally advanced ovarian cancer treated by APLN with 45 - 50 Gy/25- 28 fractions/5-7#, instead of WART. We evaluated the clinical outcome of APLN. Five patients were selected for dosimetric verifications verses WART (30 Gy/20 fractions). The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) was calculated for the two treatment methods. Results: The mean follow-up time was 64.10 months (5.5 - 113.2 months), after APLN consolidative radiotherapy, 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 87.9%, 81.3%, and 61.5%, median disease-free survival (DFS) was 40.8 months, 5-year local recurrence free survival (LRFS) was 75.9%, and 5-year distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) was 49.2%. One patient died due to intestinal perforation. Local recurrence in the area between WART and APLN was rare (3/99 patients). The number of surgical procedures < 2 was an independent risk factor for LRFS (P = 0.023). Dosimetric comparison showed that comparing with WART, APLN significantly reduced the organ at risk (OAR) dose: 25.37 ± 3.63 Gy (25%) for liver, 8.77 ± 5.03 Gy (25%) for kidney, 8.14 ± 1.51 Gy (25%) for small intestine, etc. NTCP was reduced by 0.04-1.04% for liver, kidney, and small intestine. Conclusion: For consolidative radiotherapy in locally advanced ovarian cancer, APLN (intensity-modulated radiotherapy 45 - 50 Gy/25 - 28 fractions) could be an alternative to WART, resulting in excellent LRFS and DFS, with acceptable toxicities, comparing with previous literature reports. Dosimetric analysis also showed the benefits of APLN in NTCP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.