ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022
An Easy-to-Use Approach to Detect CNV From Targeted NGS Data: Identification of a Novel Pathogenic Variant in MO Disease.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Exploring copy number alterations (CNAs) to gain new insight into SCLC heterogeneity.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Human adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in vitro expansion for regenerative applications: tracking small genetic variants reveals dynamic changes within a genetically stable framework.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Article
- Evaluation of NTRK expression and fusions in a large cohort of early-stage lung cancer.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the new next-generation sequencing (NGS) molecular approaches implemented the genetic testing in clinical diagnosis, copy number variation (CNV) detection from NGS data remains difficult mainly in the absence of bioinformatics personnel (not always available among laboratory resources) and when using very small gene panels that do not meet commercial software criteria. Furthermore, not all large deletions/duplications can be detected with the Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) technique due to both the limitations of the methodology and no kits available for the most of genes. Aim: We propose our experience regarding the identification of a novel large deletion in the context of a rare skeletal disease, multiple osteochondromas (MO), using and validating a user-friendly approach based on NGS coverage data, which does not require any dedicated software or specialized personnel. Methods: The pipeline uses a simple algorithm comparing the normalized coverage of each amplicon with the mean normalized coverage of the same amplicon in a group of "wild-type" samples representing the baseline. It has been validated on 11 samples, previously analyzed by MLPA, and then applied on 20 patients with MO but negative for the presence of pathogenic variants in Results: All the 11 known CNVs (exon and multi-exon deletions) have been detected with a sensitivity of 97.5%. A novel Conclusion: In addition to enhancing the variant detection rate in MO molecular diagnosis, this easy-to-use approach for CNV detection can be easily extended to many other diagnostic fields-especially in resource-limited settings or very small gene panels. Notably, it also allows partial-exon deletion detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.