ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Speech Kinematics and Coordination Measured With an MEG-Compatible Speech Tracking System.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Precision of Tongue Control for Task-Relevant Articulatory Goals Diminishes Without Real-Time Auditory Feedback.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- A Novel Candidate Neuromarker of Central Motor Dysfunction in Childhood Apraxia of Speech.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Decoding kinematic information from beta-band motor rhythms of speech motor cortex: a methodological/analytic approach using concurrent speech movement tracking and magnetoencephalography.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Articulography and functional neuroimaging are two major tools for studying the neurobiology of speech production. Until recently, however, it has generally not been possible to use both in the same experimental setup because of technical incompatibilities between the two methodologies. Here we describe results from a novel articulography system dubbed Magneto-articulography for the Assessment of Speech Kinematics (MASK), which we used to derive kinematic profiles of oro-facial movements during speech. MASK was used to characterize speech kinematics in two healthy adults, and the results were compared to measurements from a separate participant with a conventional Electromagnetic Articulography (EMA) system. Analyses targeted the gestural landmarks of reiterated utterances /ipa/, /api/ and /pataka/. The results demonstrate that MASK reliably characterizes key kinematic and movement coordination parameters of speech motor control. Since these parameters are intrinsically registered in time with concurrent magnetoencephalographic (MEG) measurements of neuromotor brain activity, this methodology paves the way for innovative cross-disciplinary studies of the neuromotor control of human speech production, speech development, and speech motor disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.