ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2022
Clinical efficacy and safety of 3D vascular reconstruction combined with 3D navigation in laparoscopic hepatectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and efficacy of precision hepatectomy in the treatment of primary liver cancer.BMC surgery · 2023Trial
- Impact of three-dimensional hepatic models on oncological outcomes and survival after hepatectomy: Prognostic factor analysis in a retrospective cohort.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2026Article
- Effect of laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma based on individualized three-dimensional reconstruction model of portal vein region.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Three-Dimensional Models in Hepatic Surgery: Clinical Outcomes A Single-Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Three-dimensional imaging of subepithelial tumors: feasibility and utility in preoperative assessment-a retrospective single-center observational study in Japan.Clinical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Technical advances and application strategies in anatomical hepatic resection based on Laennec's capsule.iLIVER · 2025Review
- Preoperative angio-CT colonography improves the quality of lymph node dissection during minimally invasive right hemicolectomy: a propensity score-matched study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- A clinical assessment of three-dimensional-printed liver model navigation for thrice or more repeated hepatectomy based on a conversation analysis.Surgery today · 2024Article
- A contemporary view on vascular resections and reconstruction during hepatectomies.Updates in surgery · 2024Review
- Vascular liver segmentation: a narrative review on methods and new insights brought by artificial intelligence.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Review
- Clinical superiority of 3D-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treating complex upper urinary tract calculi: a single-center study.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- An update on liver surgery - a new terminology and modern techniques.Innovative surgical sciences · 2023Review
- Fast-track virtual reality software to facilitate 3-dimensional reconstruction in congenital heart disease.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2023Article
- Review
- The clinical efficacy and safety of 3D vascular reconstruction combined with 3D navigation in laparoscopic hepatectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Article
- A novel method of ultrasound-guided positive staining using indocyanine green fluorescence in laparoscopic anatomical liver resection of segments VII and VIII.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Establishment of a risk assessment system for complications of hepatectomy based on preoperative variables.iLIVER · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Meta-analysis was used to compare the difference between 3D reconstruction technology and 2D computed tomography (CT) before surgery for primary hepatic carcinoma (PHC) and to systematically evaluate the application value of 3D vascular reconstruction and 3D navigation technology in guiding precise liver resection for PHC. However, there are still many controversies in this aspect, and there are no clear conclusions on the effectiveness and safety of three-dimensional vascular reconstruction combined with three-dimensional navigation in laparoscopic hepatectomy. Therefore, it is necessary to systematically review the results of previous studies with meta method in this study to determine their clinical efficacy and complications and guide clinical treatment. Methods: We used the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Science and Technology Periodicals Full-Text Database (VIP), and Wanfang database to conduct an online search for data from randomized controlled trials of preoperative 3D reconstruction versus conventional CT in hepatectomy published up to October 2021. Relevant literature was selected based on the inclusion criteria, data was extracted, and quality evaluation of the included literature was carried out. I Results: A total of 16 studies were included in this study. Meta-analysis showed that there were statistically significant differences between the 3D vascular reconstruction group and conventional surgery group in operation time [mean differences (MD) =-40.10, 95% confidence interval (CI): -74.94, -5.26, P=0.02, I Discussion: Preoperative 3D reconstruction plays an important role in preoperative evaluation and surgical planning, which improves the operation time of PHC and reduces the intraoperative blood loss, but no effect to length of stay in hospital or complication rate comparing to conventional 2D techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.