ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Analysis of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF Mutations, Microsatellite Instability, and Relevant Prognosis Effects in Patients With Early Colorectal Cancer: A Cohort Study in East Asia.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic role of C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index in gastrointestinal malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- Triglyceride-to-glucose index and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio enhance prognostic accuracy for colorectal cancer patients: a multicenter machine learning cohort study.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- A set cover algorithm identifies minimal circulating tumour DNA sequencing targets for colorectal cancer detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Molecular and Immunohistochemical Biomarkers in Colorectal Carcinoma - A Single Center Study.Balkan journal of medical genetics : BJMG · 2025Article
- Biomarkers for colorectal cancer detection: An insight into colorectal cancer and FDA-approved biomarkers.BioImpacts : BI · 2025Review
- Article
- High Probability of Lynch Syndrome Among Colorectal Cancer Patients Is Associated With Higher Occurrence of KRAS and PIK3CA Mutations.World journal of oncology · 2024Article
- Exploring the Therapeutic Potential ofCurrent drug discovery technologies · 2024Article
- Detecting colorectal cancer using genetic and epigenetic biomarkers: screening and diagnosis.Journal of medicine and life · 2024Review
- Differential Perspectives by Specialty on Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Korean Oligometastasis Working Group's Comparative Survey Study.Cancer research and treatment · 2023Article
- The role of heavy metals in the development of colorectal cancer.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Single-center study on clinicopathological and typical molecular pathologic features of metastatic brain tumor.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early colorectal cancer (ECRC) refers to any size of colorectal cancer (CRC) whose depth of invasion is limited to the mucosa and submucosa. About 10% of patients with ECRC die from cancer after surgery. KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations and microsatellite instability (MSI) are considered diagnostic and prognostic markers in CRC. However, their characteristics in ECRC and whether postoperative chemotherapy based on them will benefit ECRC patients or not remain unknown. Patients and Methods: Patients with ECRC and 298 patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC) were collected in our hospital from January 2013 to December 2015. The Amplification Refractory Mutation System (ARMS)-PCR was used to perform the KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutant tests. Results: In ECRC patients, 43 cases of KRAS mutation were found, accounting for 69.35%. Interestingly, among KRAS mutations, there were 10 KRAS multi-site mutation patients (16.13% in 62 ECRC patients). Moreover, the NRAS mutation rate was 3.23% but no BRAF mutation was found and only 1 case of MSI-High was detected. KRAS mutation was only related to the depth of tumor invasion whereas KRAS multi-site mutations were related to mucus components and tumor size. As far as NRAS is concerned, mutations were associated with elevated CEA, mucus components, and the depth of tumor invasion. Notably, compared with 2.35% KRAS multi-site mutation in ACRC, the rate of KRAS multi-site mutation in ECRC was much higher. Furthermore, Cox regression analysis revealed that KRAS mutation could be an independent prognostic factor of ECRC in patients who have undergone endoscopic resection or surgery. Conclusion: Patients with ECRC might benefit from KRAS mutation testing but not from postoperative chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.