Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35837113›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

The Diagnostic Potential of

Hong Gao, Jun Yang, Lu He, Wei Wang, Yanhong Liu, Yue Hu, Meiling Ge, Jie Ding, Qing Ye

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical value of combinedOncology reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Current Status and Future Perspectives of Molecular Residual Disease Testing in Genitourinary Cancers.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Review
  9. Detection ofMolecular and clinical oncology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Hypermethylation ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hong GaoDepartment of Pathology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Jun YangDepartment of Pathology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Lu HeDepartment of Pathology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Wei WangDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Yanhong LiuDepartment of Pathology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Yue HuDepartment of Pathology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Meiling GeDepartment of Pathology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Jie DingDepartment of Pathology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Qing YeDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CNUniversity of Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Methylation of the promoters of Materials and Methods: We selected 54 patients with early LUAD and 31 patients with benign lung nodules as a NJDT cohort and evaluated their DNA methylation and mRNA sequencing levels. The DNA methylation sequencing, mRNA sequencing, and clinical data for patients with LUAD were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas, and served as a TCGA cohort. We evaluated the diagnostic potential of a Results: In the NJDT cohort, the sensitivity of the combined promoter methylation assay on tumor samples was 74.07%, the sensitivity on paired tumor and paracancerous samples was 77.78%, and the specificities in both contexts were 100%. The combined promoter methylation-positive patients had clinicopathologic features including older age, larger tumors, deeper invasion, and higher Ki-67 expression. In both cohorts, Conclusion: The combined promoter methylation assay for

Indexed as

DNA instabilityDNA methylation detectionearly lung adenocarcinomafolate acid metabolismRASSF1Ashox2tumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID35837113
PMCPMC9273978
OpenAlexW4283658442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.