Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35837093›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

A Pilot, Prospective, Observational Study to Investigate the Value of NGS in Liquid Biopsies to Predict Tumor Response After Neoadjuvant Chemo-Radiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: The LiBReCa Study.

Raffaello Roesel, Samantha Epistolio, Francesca Molinari, Piercarlo Saletti, Sara De Dosso, Mariacarla Valli, Alessandra Franzetti-Pellanda, Letizia Deantonio, Maira Biggiogero, Paolo Spina and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Raffaello RoeselDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Regional Hospital of Lugano, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland.
Samantha EpistolioIstituto Cantonale di Patologia, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Locarno, Switzerland.
Francesca MolinariIstituto Cantonale di Patologia, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Locarno, Switzerland.
Piercarlo SalettiClinical Research Unit, Clinica Luganese Moncucco, Lugano, Switzerland.
Sara De DossoFaculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland.
Mariacarla ValliRadiation Oncology Clinic, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Alessandra Franzetti-PellandaService of Radiotherapy, Clinica Luganese Moncucco, Lugano, Switzerland.
Letizia DeantonioFaculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland.
Maira BiggiogeroClinical Research Unit, Clinica Luganese Moncucco, Lugano, Switzerland.
Paolo SpinaIstituto Cantonale di Patologia, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Locarno, Switzerland.
Sotirios Georgios PopeskouDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Regional Hospital of Lugano, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland.
Alessandra CristaudiDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Regional Hospital of Lugano, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland.
Francesco MongelliDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Regional Hospital of Lugano, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland.
Luca MazzucchelliIstituto Cantonale di Patologia, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Locarno, Switzerland.
Federico Mattia StefaniniFaculty of Science and Technology-ESP, University of Milan, Milano, Italy.
Milo FrattiniIstituto Cantonale di Patologia, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Locarno, Switzerland.
Dimitri ChristoforidisDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Regional Hospital of Lugano, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland.
Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale · CHClinica Luganese Moncucco · CHOspedale regionale di Lugano · CHIstituto Cantonale di Patologia · CHUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) correlates with the response to therapy in different types of cancer. However, in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), little is known about how ctDNA levels change with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (Na-ChRT) and how they correlate with treatment response. This work aimed to explore the value of serial liquid biopsies in monitoring response after Na-ChRT with the hypothesis that this could become a reliable biomarker to identify patients with a complete response, candidates for non-operative management. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five consecutive LARC patients undergoing long-term Na-ChRT therapy were included. Applying next-generation sequencing (NGS), we characterized DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded diagnostic biopsy and resection tissue and plasma ctDNA collected at the following time points: the first and last days of radiotherapy (T Results: We found no association between the disappearance of ctDNA mutations in plasma samples and pathological complete response (TRG1) as ctDNA was undetectable in the majority of patients from Tend on. However, we observed that the poor (TRG 4) response to Na-ChRT was significantly associated with a positive liquid biopsy at the T Conclusions: ctDNA evaluation by NGS technology may identify LARC patients with poor response to Na-ChRT. In contrast, this technique does not seem useful for identifying patients prone to developing a complete response.

Indexed as

circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)LARCliquid biopsynext-generation sequencingrectal cancer (RC)watch and wait approach

Identifiers

PMID35837093
PMCPMC9274270
OpenAlexW4283658750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.