Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35837033›Full record

ReviewExperimental and therapeutic medicine2022

Phenotypic and genotypic detection methods for antimicrobial resistance in ESKAPE pathogens (Review).

Mădălina Maria Muntean, Andrei-Alexandru Muntean, Mădălina Preda, Loredana Sabina Cornelia Manolescu, Cerasella Dragomirescu, Mircea-Ioan Popa, Gabriela Loredana Popa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Antibiotic resistance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Methicillin-resistantJournal of medical microbiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mădălina Maria MunteanDepartment of Microbiology, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Andrei-Alexandru MunteanDepartment of Microbiology, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Mădălina PredaDepartment of Microbiology, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Loredana Sabina Cornelia ManolescuDepartment of Microbiology, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Cerasella DragomirescuDepartment of Microbiology, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Mircea-Ioan PopaDepartment of Microbiology, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Gabriela Loredana PopaDepartment of Microbiology, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents a growing public health problem worldwide. Infections with such bacteria lead to longer hospitalization times, higher healthcare costs and greater morbidity and mortality. Thus, there is a greater need for rapid detection methods in order to limit their spread. The ESKAPE pathogens (

Indexed as

antibiotic resistancedetectionESKAPEgenotypic detectionphenotypic detectionresistance mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID35837033
PMCPMC9257796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.