Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35837003›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular techniques : JBT2022

Cell Sorter Cleaning Practices and Their Impact on Instrument Sterility.

Andrew Box, Laura Holmes, Monica DeLay, Dave Adams, Alan Bergeron, Karen Clise-Dwyer, Matt Cochran, Roxana Del Rio Guerra, E Michael Meyer, Kathleen M Brundage

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Detection of Single Cell Contamination ofFood safety (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew BoxStowers Institute for Medical Research Kansas City, Missouri 64110 USA.
Laura HolmesStowers Institute for Medical Research Kansas City, Missouri 64110 USA.
Monica DeLayCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati Academic Medical Center Cincinnati, Ohio 45229 USA.
Dave AdamsUniversity of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 USA.
Alan BergeronDartmouth College Hanover, New Hampshire 03755 USA.
Karen Clise-DwyerMD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas Houston, Texas 77030 USA.
Matt CochranUniversity of Rochester Medical Center Rochester 14642, New York USA.
Roxana Del Rio GuerraUniversity of Vermont Burlington, Vermont 05405 USA.
E Michael MeyerUniversity of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15232 USA.
Kathleen M BrundageWest Virginia University Morgantown, West Virginia 26506 USA.
Stowers Institute for Medical Research · USDartmouth College · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · USUniversity of Vermont · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

WVU Flow Cytometry and Single Cell Core Facility (FCSCCF)P20GM121322 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI William Harry Walker · 2018 to 2026
$22.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells isolated using electrostatic cell sorters are subsequently evaluated in a variety of in vitro and in vivo applications. Thus, manipulations to the cells during the pre- and post-sort processing as well as when the cells are being analyzed by and passing through the sorter fluidics has the potential to affect the experimental results. There are many variables to consider when seeking to preserve cellular integrity and function during the cell-sorting process. A previous study by the Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities Flow Cytometry Research Group (FCRG) investigated downstream effects on different cell types as a function of sorting variables such as pressure, nozzle size, and temperature. This multisite study revealed site-to-site variability based on differential gene expression when the same cell type and sort conditions were used. These results indicated the possibility that environmental factors such as the presence of contaminants in the sorter fluidics could exhibit effects on downstream molecular assays (ie, endotoxins or RNases). In the study described here, the FCRG sought to better understand how sorters are maintained and evaluated for contaminants such as bacteria, endotoxin, and RNases. In addition, the efficacy of an endotoxin decontamination method was evaluated. The results demonstrated that the majority of sorters in shared resource laboratories are free of RNase activity and bacteria; however, many are contaminated with endotoxin. The efficacy of a hydrogen peroxide cleaning procedure was tested and found to exhibit only a short-term effectiveness in eliminating endotoxin contamination.

Indexed as

InfertilityLaboratoriesCell SeparationEndotoxinsFlow CytometryHumansEndotoxinscontaminationendotoxinRNasesortersterility

Identifiers

PMID35837003
PMCPMC9258916
OpenAlexW4210541361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.