ArticleJournal of biomolecular techniques : JBT2022
Automated DNA, RNA, and Protein Extraction from Urine for Biobanking.
Article in Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Urinary DNA Extraction in Uro-Oncology and Selected Non-Urological Malignancies: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Detection of the ADGRG6 hotspot mutations in urine for bladder cancer early screening by ARMS-qPCR.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction/Objective: DNA, RNA, and proteins are unavoidable human biomarkers. Today, blood remains the commonly used source of biomarkers despite numerous limitations. Therefore, other sources of biomarkers such as urine could be more appropriate for research in the field of bladder cancer. The aim of this study was to set up a new automated procedure for urinary DNA, RNA, and protein extraction and to evaluate their quality and quantity. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted in the setting of the COBLAnCE cohort. Urinary DNA and RNA were extracted using the Maxwell 16 system, and urinary proteins were isolated by precipitation from the supernatant and the cell pellet. The concentration and purity of nucleic acids were determined by spectrophotometry. RNA integrity was determined by the Agilent Bioanalyzer. PCR assays were also used to ensure the quality of DNA and RNA samples. The quality of protein samples obtained was determined by Western blot analysis. Results: PCR experiments performed highlighted that it is possible to use the DNA and RNA samples for amplification, gene expression, or genotyping. However, DNA and RNA recovery from urine was highly variable among patients, with a significant impact of the patient's gender. The samples were highly degraded. Finally, our protocol of protein isolation was effective in extracting urinary supernatant proteins as well as pellet proteins. Discussion: Therefore, urine samples could constitute valuable resources for subsequent investigations in bladder cancer. These samples will allow identifying new easy-access biomarkers for the early detection of cancer, monitoring cancer progression, and assessing response to therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.