Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35836947›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Predicting Axial Length From Choroidal Thickness on Optical Coherence Tomography Images With Machine Learning Based Algorithms.

Hao-Chun Lu, Hsin-Yi Chen, Chien-Jung Huang, Pao-Hsien Chu, Lung-Sheng Wu, Chia-Ying Tsai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Insights into artificial intelligence in myopia management: from a data perspective.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. IMI 2023 Digest.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hao-Chun LuGraduate Institute of Business and Management, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Hsin-Yi ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Chien-Jung HuangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Pao-Hsien ChuDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Lung-Sheng WuDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chia-Ying TsaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We formulated and tested ensemble learning models to classify axial length (AXL) from choroidal thickness (CT) as indicated on fovea-centered, 2D single optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Participants: We analyzed 710 OCT images from 355 eyes of 188 patients. Each eye had 2 OCT images. Methods: The CT was estimated from 3 points of each image. We used five machine-learning base algorithms to construct the classifiers. This study trained and validated the models to classify the AXLs eyes based on binary (AXL < or > 26 mm) and multiclass (AXL < 22 mm, between 22 and 26 mm, and > 26 mm) classifications. Results: No features were redundant or duplicated after an analysis using Pearson's correlation coefficient, LASSO-Pattern search algorithm, and variance inflation factors. Among the positions, CT at the nasal side had the highest correlation with AXL followed by the central area. In binary classification, our classifiers obtained high accuracy, as indicated by accuracy, recall, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), F1 score, and area under ROC curve (AUC) values of 94.37, 100, 90.91, 100, 86.67, and 95.61%, respectively. In multiclass classification, our classifiers were also highly accurate, as indicated by accuracy, weighted recall, weighted PPV, weighted NPV, weighted F1 score, and macro AUC of 88.73, 88.73, 91.21, 85.83, 87.42, and 93.42%, respectively. Conclusions: Our binary and multiclass classifiers classify AXL well from CT, as indicated on OCT images. We demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed classifiers and provided an assistance tool for physicians.

Indexed as

axial lengthchoroidal thicknessensemble learninghigh myopiamachine learningoptical coherence tomography (OCT)

Identifiers

PMID35836947
PMCPMC9273745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.