ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Predicting Axial Length From Choroidal Thickness on Optical Coherence Tomography Images With Machine Learning Based Algorithms.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in pathologic myopia: a review of clinical research studies.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning models for prognosis prediction in regenerative endodontic procedures.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Retinal vessel density alteration after FS-LASIK for myopia with different axial lengths.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Insights into artificial intelligence in myopia management: from a data perspective.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024Review
- Machine-learning models to predict myopia in children and adolescents.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- IMI 2023 Digest.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
- Machine learning to analyze the factors influencing myopia in students of different school periods.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Compartmental analysis of three-dimensional choroidal vascularity and thickness of myopic eyes in young adults using SS-OCTA.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Choroid Visualization for Myopia: A Comprehensive Scoping Review.Middle East African journal of ophthalmologyArticle
- Shaping the future of myopia with artificial intelligence: Mapping trends and promising directions.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We formulated and tested ensemble learning models to classify axial length (AXL) from choroidal thickness (CT) as indicated on fovea-centered, 2D single optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Participants: We analyzed 710 OCT images from 355 eyes of 188 patients. Each eye had 2 OCT images. Methods: The CT was estimated from 3 points of each image. We used five machine-learning base algorithms to construct the classifiers. This study trained and validated the models to classify the AXLs eyes based on binary (AXL < or > 26 mm) and multiclass (AXL < 22 mm, between 22 and 26 mm, and > 26 mm) classifications. Results: No features were redundant or duplicated after an analysis using Pearson's correlation coefficient, LASSO-Pattern search algorithm, and variance inflation factors. Among the positions, CT at the nasal side had the highest correlation with AXL followed by the central area. In binary classification, our classifiers obtained high accuracy, as indicated by accuracy, recall, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), F1 score, and area under ROC curve (AUC) values of 94.37, 100, 90.91, 100, 86.67, and 95.61%, respectively. In multiclass classification, our classifiers were also highly accurate, as indicated by accuracy, weighted recall, weighted PPV, weighted NPV, weighted F1 score, and macro AUC of 88.73, 88.73, 91.21, 85.83, 87.42, and 93.42%, respectively. Conclusions: Our binary and multiclass classifiers classify AXL well from CT, as indicated on OCT images. We demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed classifiers and provided an assistance tool for physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.