ReviewAmerican journal of translational research2022
A meta-analysis of the prognostic value of circulating tumor cells in ovarian cancer.
Review in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Advances of Molecular Biomarkers and Liquid Biopsies Techniques in Ovarian Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of single circulating tumor cells in the follow-up of high-grade serous ovarian cancer.Molecular oncology · 2026Article
- Pre-operative circulating tumor cells predict worse treatment outcome in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer.Oncogene · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the prognostic value of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in ovarian cancer.
methodsChinese databases (Wanfang, Cqvip, CNKI) and English databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, SinoMed, Cochrane Library) were retrieved to collect relevant studies on CTCs evaluation of ovarian cancer prognosis. Data were extracted to analyze the effect of CTCs on the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients, and a meta-analysis was performed using Stata 15 software.
resultsNineteen studies were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that ovarian cancer patients with positive CTCs had a shorter OS and higher death rate, (HR=1.57, 95% CI: 1.30, 1.84), a shorter PFS and an increased risk of disease progression (HR=1.29, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.54) compared with patients with negative CTCs. Subgroup analysis showed that the HRs for death and disease progression were higher in CTCs-positive patients after treatment than those patients with negative CTCs (P<0.05).
conclusionCTCs detection has a high application value in the prognosis assessment of ovarian cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35836887PMC9274549What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.