Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35836793›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2022

Participant and research team perspectives on the conduct of a remote therapeutic COVID-19 clinical trial: A mixed methods approach.

Denise H Daudelin, Sarah K Brewer, Alyssa B Cabrera, Dorothy Dulko, Harry P Selker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Narrative review of telemedicine applications in decentralized research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Denise H DaudelinTufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6758-7753
Sarah K BrewerTufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7703-0871
Alyssa B CabreraTufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Dorothy DulkoTufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Harry P SelkerTufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Tufts University · US

Funding

Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute (Pilot Supplement)UL1TR002544 · NCATS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI SELKER, HARRY P. · 2018 to 2022
$50.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Responding to the need to investigate potential treatments of COVID-19, a research team employed a telehealth platform to determine whether niclosamide, an oral anthelmintic drug that had shown antiviral activity, reduced SARS-CoV-2 shedding and duration of symptoms in patients with mild-to-moderate symptoms of COVID-19. To encourage compliance with patient self-quarantine, this randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted utilizing a remote telehealth design to complete all study visits, monitor symptoms, and coordinate participant self-collected specimens. Methods: A mixed methods approach employing surveys and interviews of trial participants and interviews of research team members was used to collect their experiences with and perspectives on the acceptability of the remote clinical trial design and delivery. Results: Of the 67 eligible trial participants invited to take part in a study to evaluate the telehealth platform, 46% ( Conclusions: The COVID-19 crisis was a call to action to expand understanding of the conduct of remote clinical trials, including the experiences of research participants. Our findings showed that this approach can be both effective for the conduct of research and positive for participants. Further research on the use of telehealth research platforms seems warranted in rural, underserved populations, and remote trials of prevention, screening, and treatment.

Indexed as

COVID-19Remote clinical trialresearch participant experience

Identifiers

PMID35836793
PMCPMC9257771
OpenAlexW4225276678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.