Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35836745›Full record

ReviewJornal vascular brasileiro2022

Challenges of extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in medical and surgical patients.

Maria Chiara Chindamo, Edison Ferreira Paiva, Plinio Resende do Carmo, Ana Thereza Cavalcanti Rocha, Marcos Arêas Marques

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Jornal vascular brasileiro, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria Chiara ChindamoUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-5817-9221
Edison Ferreira PaivaUniversidade de São Paulo - USP, Faculdade de Medicina - FM, Hospital das Clínicas - HC, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-6461-4576
Plinio Resende do CarmoUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-7869-8128
Ana Thereza Cavalcanti RochaFaculdade de Medicina da Bahia - UFBA, Salvador, BA, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-5321-2598
Marcos Arêas MarquesUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-5329-7819

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients hospitalized for acute medical and surgical illnesses are at risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) during hospitalization and after discharge. Extended pharmacological prophylaxis beyond the hospital stay is recommended for patients undergoing surgeries at high risk for VTE and for selected groups of hospitalized medical patients. This practice involves several challenges, from identification of at-risk populations eligible for extended prophylaxis to choice of the most appropriate anticoagulant and definition of the ideal duration of use. This review will present the main VTE risk assessment models for hospitalized medical and surgical patients, the current recommendations for use of extended prophylaxis, and its limitations and benefits.

Indexed as

clinical protocolsdisease preventionpatient safetypulmonary embolismrisk managementvenous thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID35836745
PMCPMC9250351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.