Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35836646›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2022

Prediction of Patients with COVID-19 Requiring Intensive Care: A Cross-sectional Study Based on Machine-learning Approach from Iran.

Golnar Sabetian, Aram Azimi, Azar Kazemi, Benyamin Hoseini, Naeimehossadat Asmarian, Vahid Khaloo, Farid Zand, Mansoor Masjedi, Reza Shahriarirad, Sepehr Shahriarirad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Development and validation of nomogram for predicting the risk of transferring to the ICU for children with influenza.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Author Response.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparison of Six Scoring Systems for Predicting In-hospital Mortality among Patients with SARS-COV2 Presenting to the Emergency Department.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Golnar SabetianShiraz University of Medical Sciences, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8764-2150
Aram AzimiShiraz University of Medical Sciences, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2730-5552
Azar KazemiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3197-0491
Benyamin HoseiniMashhad University of Medical Sciences, Pharmaceutical Research Center, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan Province, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0355-6181
Naeimehossadat AsmarianShiraz University of Medical Sciences, Aliasghar Hospital, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6091-8890
Vahid KhalooShiraz University of Medical Sciences, Aliasghar Hospital, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1932-0592
Farid ZandShiraz University of Medical Sciences, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3489-3372
Mansoor MasjediShiraz University of Medical Sciences, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6175-9289
Reza ShahriariradShiraz University of Medical Sciences, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery Research Center, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5454-495X
Sepehr ShahriariradShiraz University of Medical Sciences, Student Research Committee, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9567-5996

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prioritizing the patients requiring intensive care may decrease the fatality of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Aims and objectives: To develop, validate, and compare two models based on machine-learning methods for predicting patients with COVID-19 requiring intensive care. Materials and methods: In 2021, 506 suspected COVID-19 patients, with clinical presentations along with radiographic findings, were laboratory confirmed and included in the study. The primary end-point was patients with COVID-19 requiring intensive care, defined as actual admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). The data were randomly partitioned into training and testing sets (70% and 30%, respectively) without overlapping. A decision-tree algorithm and multivariate logistic regression were performed to develop the models for predicting the cases based on their first 24 hours data. The predictive performance of the models was compared based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and accuracy of the models. Results: A 10-fold cross-validation decision-tree model predicted cases requiring intensive care with the AUC, accuracy, and sensitivity of 97%, 98%, and 94.74%, respectively. The same values in the machine-learning logistic regression model were 75%, 85.62%, and 55.26%, respectively. Creatinine, smoking, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, temperature, respiratory rate, partial thromboplastin time, white blood cell, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), dizziness, international normalized ratio, O Conclusion: In an Iranian population, our decision-based machine-learning method offered an advantage over logistic regression for predicting patients requiring intensive care. This method can support clinicians in decision-making, using patients' early data, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where their resources are as limited as Iran. How to cite this article: Sabetian G, Azimi A, Kazemi A, Hoseini B, Asmarian N, Khaloo V, Ethics approval: This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR.SUMS.REC.1399.018).

Indexed as

COVID-19Intensive careIranMachine-learningPredictionRegression

Identifiers

PMID35836646
PMCPMC9237161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.