Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35836633›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2022

Is There a Role of Presepsin as a Novel Biomarker in Pediatric Sepsis?

Daisy Khera, Nisha Toteja, Surjit Singh, Simranjeet Singh, Prawin Kumar, Praveen Sharma, Kuldeep Singh

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Presepsin: Hope in the Quest for the Holy Grail.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daisy KheraDepartment of Pediatrics, AIIMS, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2963-1370
Nisha TotejaDepartment of Pediatrics, AIIMS, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3667-5881
Surjit SinghDepartment of Pharmacology, AIIMS, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8990-3235
Simranjeet SinghDepartment of Pediatrics, AIIMS, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4012-9736
Prawin KumarDepartment of Pediatrics, AIIMS, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2365-8097
Praveen SharmaDepartment of Biochemistry, AIIMS, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8324-737X
Kuldeep SinghDepartment of Pediatrics, AIIMS, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9375-3233
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sepsis in children is a conundrum of diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. There is an exigent need for a novel biomarker that can serve as a clear distinguisher of sepsis from other non-septic inflammatory conditions. The role of presepsin as a biomarker of sepsis in children is still a matter of scientific inquiry. Aim and objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin for the prediction of septic shock, in children aged 1 month to 18 years. Materials and methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted in the pediatric emergency, ward, and intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital. We enrolled all consecutive admissions aged 1 month to 18 years with a diagnosis of sepsis and compared the presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels on admission (day 1) and 72 hours later (day 4) with the clinical outcomes. Results: The mean (±SD) presepsin values in blood culture-proven sepsis patients at admission and 72 hours later were 609.77 ± 417.30 and 839 ± 748.07, respectively. The procalcitonin and presepsin levels at 72 hours in sepsis patients with shock were significantly elevated (38.2 ± 45.55 and 1129.1 ± 1133.80, respectively) as compared to those without shock (10.7 ± 25.42 and 472.5 ± 507.81, respectively), Conclusion: Elevated presepsin levels may indicate greater severity of sepsis, particularly in those with shock. However, it lacks diagnostic ability early in the disease and has limited prognostic potential in predicting mortality. How to cite this article: Khera D, Toteja N, Singh S, Singh S, Kumar P, Sharma P,

Indexed as

BiomarkersPresepsinSepsis

Identifiers

PMID35836633
PMCPMC9237156
OpenAlexW4281755063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.