ArticleTranslational cancer research2022
Diagnostic value of objective VELscope fluorescence methods in distinguishing oral cancer from oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs).
Article in Translational cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating the Role of VELscope in Oral Cancer and Pre-Cancer Screening: A Scoping Review.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Value of Serum and Salivary Podoplanin as Clinical Biomarkers for Distinguishing Oral Cancer from Oral Leukoplakia.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Diagnostic efficacy of VELscope in oral potentially malignant disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Review
- Autofluorescence and deep learning in early disease detection: biological foundations, clinical applications, and future directions.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- In-vivo non-contact multispectral oral disease image dataset with segmentation.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Oral Mucosal Lesions Using the IllumiScanInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Fluorescence visualization as an auxiliary method to detect oral potentially malignant disorders and oral cancer.Translational cancer research · 2022Article
- Efficacy of Autofluorescence in Detection of Tobacco-associated Oral Mucosal Lesions - A Systematic Review.Annals of maxillofacial surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The VELscope fluorescence method has been applied to the identification and detection of oral potentially malignant disorders, but autofluorescence visualization lacks objectivity and its diagnostic value varies greatly. The effectiveness of VELscope in detection of the cancer risk in oral potentially malignant disorders at different lesion sites remains unclear, given that only a few studies have investigated the value of VELscope for detecting high- and low-risk lesions in oral potentially malignant disorders. This study used the objective VELscope fluorescence method based on quantitative analysis to investigate its value in oral potentially malignant disorders for: (I) detecting oral cancer; (II) distinguishing high-risk lesions from low-risk lesions; and (III) measuring differences in oral cancer diagnostic accuracy between different sites. Methods: Conventional oral examination and subjective and objective VELscope examinations were performed on 59 oral potentially malignant disorders; autofluorescence results were compared with histopathological diagnosis. Results: The sensitivity of subjective and objective VELscope fluorescence methods for detecting oral cancer in oral potentially malignant disorders was 76.9% and 65.4%, respectively; specificity for distinguishing high-risk from low-risk lesions in oral potentially malignant disorders was 50.0% and 82.1%, respectively; and sensitivity for detecting oral cancer in oral potentially malignant disorders of lining mucosa was 81.0%, higher than that of the masticatory mucosa. Conclusions: The identification ability for low-risk lesions can be improved by combining it with objective autofluorescence. Autofluorescence has different screening abilities in different parts of the oral mucosa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.