Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35836514›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2022

Diagnostic value of objective VELscope fluorescence methods in distinguishing oral cancer from oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs).

Caijiao Wang, Xiangmin Qi, Xiaofang Zhou, Hongrui Liu, Minqi Li

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of Oral Mucosal Lesions Using the IllumiScanInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caijiao WangDepartment of Bone Metabolism, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University & Shandong Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Engineering Laboratory for Dental Materials and Oral Tissue Regeneration, Jinan, China.
Xiangmin QiDepartment of Bone Metabolism, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University & Shandong Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Engineering Laboratory for Dental Materials and Oral Tissue Regeneration, Jinan, China.
Xiaofang ZhouDepartment of Bone Metabolism, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University & Shandong Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Engineering Laboratory for Dental Materials and Oral Tissue Regeneration, Jinan, China.
Hongrui LiuDepartment of Bone Metabolism, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University & Shandong Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Engineering Laboratory for Dental Materials and Oral Tissue Regeneration, Jinan, China.
Minqi LiDepartment of Bone Metabolism, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University & Shandong Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Engineering Laboratory for Dental Materials and Oral Tissue Regeneration, Jinan, China.
Shandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The VELscope fluorescence method has been applied to the identification and detection of oral potentially malignant disorders, but autofluorescence visualization lacks objectivity and its diagnostic value varies greatly. The effectiveness of VELscope in detection of the cancer risk in oral potentially malignant disorders at different lesion sites remains unclear, given that only a few studies have investigated the value of VELscope for detecting high- and low-risk lesions in oral potentially malignant disorders. This study used the objective VELscope fluorescence method based on quantitative analysis to investigate its value in oral potentially malignant disorders for: (I) detecting oral cancer; (II) distinguishing high-risk lesions from low-risk lesions; and (III) measuring differences in oral cancer diagnostic accuracy between different sites. Methods: Conventional oral examination and subjective and objective VELscope examinations were performed on 59 oral potentially malignant disorders; autofluorescence results were compared with histopathological diagnosis. Results: The sensitivity of subjective and objective VELscope fluorescence methods for detecting oral cancer in oral potentially malignant disorders was 76.9% and 65.4%, respectively; specificity for distinguishing high-risk from low-risk lesions in oral potentially malignant disorders was 50.0% and 82.1%, respectively; and sensitivity for detecting oral cancer in oral potentially malignant disorders of lining mucosa was 81.0%, higher than that of the masticatory mucosa. Conclusions: The identification ability for low-risk lesions can be improved by combining it with objective autofluorescence. Autofluorescence has different screening abilities in different parts of the oral mucosa.

Indexed as

autofluorescenceoral canceroral epithelial dysplasia (OED)oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs)VELscope

Identifiers

PMID35836514
PMCPMC9273673
OpenAlexW4285512392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.