Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35836507›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2022

Development and validation of a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-based prognostic nomogram for predicting survival in gastric cancer with multi-organ metastases.

Ting Wang, Chuan Liu, Wancong Wang, Binglu Huang, Rong Yu, Mengting Huang, Weiguo Dong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ting Wang *Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Chuan Liu *Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Wancong WangDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital, Xi'ning, China.
Binglu HuangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Rong YuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Mengting HuangFaculty of Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Weiguo DongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nomogram can be used to accurately predict the prognosis of patients and guide treatment according to the individual situation of patients. This study is to investigate the independent prognostic factors for multi-organ metastases in gastric cancer (GC) patients, and construct and validate prognostic nomograms for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Methods: The clinical data of GC patients with multi-organ metastases from 2010 to 2018 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The independent prognostic factors affecting the OS and CSS of the patients were screened using univariate and multivariate Cox's proportional hazards model and the Fine-Gray competing risk model. Corresponding nomogram models were constructed to predict the OS and CSS of the patients. The reliability and accuracy of the prediction model were evaluated by consistency index (C-index), area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and calibration curve. Results: A total of 1,386 patients were included and randomly divided into a training group (972 cases) and a validation group (414 cases) in a 7:3 ratio. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that age [P<0.001, hazard ratio (HR) =1.29 (1.11-1.49)], race (P=0.018, HR =0.79 (0.65-0.96)], metastases [P=0.036, HR =1.96 (1.05-3.67)], tumor size [P=0.045, HR =1.35 (1.01-1.82)], degree of differentiation [P=0.002, HR =1.99 (1.30-3.06)] and metastasis surgery (P=0.005, HR =0.52 (0.33-0.82)] were independent prognostic factors for OS in GC patients with multi-organ metastases. The Fine-Gray competing risk analysis showed that age [P=0.006, HR =1.23 (1.06-1.42)], histological type [P=0.037, HR =1.53 (1.03-2.27)], metastases [P=0.009, HR =2.02 (1.19-3.41)], tumor size [P=0.028, HR =1.33 (1.03-1.70)], degree of differentiation [P=0.009, HR =1.65 (1.13-2.40)] and metastasis surgery [P=0.001, HR =0.50 (0.32-0.76)] were independent prognostic factors for CSS in GC patients with multi-organ metastases. The above factors were used to construct nomogram models for predicting OS and CSS. Both C-index and AUC of the training group and the validation group showed that the models had an acceptable predictive performance. The calibration curve showed that the predicted and ideal curves fit well, indicating that the constructed models were well-calibrated. Conclusions: Using data from the SEER database, this study established and validated nomogram models for OS and CSS in GC patients with multi-organ metastases, to help clinicians formulate accurate and individualized treatment plans.

Indexed as

Gastric cancer (GC)multi-organ metastasesnomogramprognosisSurveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)

Identifiers

PMID35836507
PMCPMC9273680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.