Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35836479›Full record

ReviewThe journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces2022

Opportunities and Challenges for Alternative Nanoplasmonic Metals: Magnesium and Beyond.

Elizabeth R Hopper, Christina Boukouvala, Jérémie Asselin, John S Biggins, Emilie Ringe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Interfacial Role of DopantNanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Conundrums of Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensors.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Alternative Plasmonic Materials for Fluorescence Enhancement.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Seed-mediated synthesis of monodisperse plasmonic magnesium nanoparticles.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth R HopperDepartment of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, 27 Charles Babbage Road, Cambridge CB3 0FS, United Kingdom.
Christina BoukouvalaDepartment of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, 27 Charles Babbage Road, Cambridge CB3 0FS, United Kingdom.
Jérémie AsselinDepartment of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, 27 Charles Babbage Road, Cambridge CB3 0FS, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6220-6739
John S BigginsDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7452-2421
Emilie RingeDepartment of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, 27 Charles Babbage Road, Cambridge CB3 0FS, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3743-9204

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S017186/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Materials that sustain localized surface plasmon resonances have a broad technology potential as attractive platforms for surface-enhanced spectroscopies, chemical and biological sensing, light-driven catalysis, hyperthermal cancer therapy, waveguides, and so on. Most plasmonic nanoparticles studied to date are composed of either Ag or Au, for which a vast array of synthetic approaches are available, leading to controllable size and shape. However, recently, alternative materials capable of generating plasmonically enhanced light-matter interactions have gained prominence, notably Cu, Al, In, and Mg. In this Perspective, we give an overview of the attributes of plasmonic nanostructures that lead to their potential use and how their performance is dictated by the choice of plasmonic material, emphasizing the similarities and differences between traditional and emerging plasmonic compositions. First, we discuss the materials limitation encapsulated by the dielectric function. Then, we evaluate how size and shape maneuver localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) energy and field distribution and address how this impacts applications. Next, biocompatibility, reactivity, and cost, all key differences underlying the potential of non-noble metals, are highlighted. We find that metals beyond Ag and Au are of competitive plasmonic quality. We argue that by thinking outside of the box, i.e., by looking at nonconventional materials such as Mg, one can broaden the frequency range and, more importantly, combine the plasmonic response with other properties essential for the implementation of plasmonic technologies.

Identifiers

PMID35836479
PMCPMC9272400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.