Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35836283›Full record

ArticleGlobalization and health2022

Developing mental health services during and in the aftermath of the Ebola virus disease outbreak in armed conflict settings: a scoping review.

Bives Mutume Nzanzu Vivalya, Martial Mumbere Vagheni, Germain Manzekele Bin Kitoko, Jeremie Muhindo Vutegha, Augustin Kensale Kalume, Astride Lina Piripiri, Yvonne Duagani Masika, Jean-Bosco Kahindo Mbeva

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Globalization and health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Impact of COVID-19 on Neuropsychiatric Disorders.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bives Mutume Nzanzu VivalyaDepartment of Psychiatry, Kampala International University Western Campus, P.O BOX 71, Bushenyi, Uganda. nzanzumutume@kiu.ac.ug.ORCID 0000-0003-2068-2830
Martial Mumbere VagheniDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Germain Manzekele Bin KitokoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Jeremie Muhindo VuteghaDivision provinciale de la Sante, Goma, North-Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Augustin Kensale KalumeDepartment of Psychiatry, Kampala International University Western Campus, P.O BOX 71, Bushenyi, Uganda.
Astride Lina PiripiriKinshasa School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Yvonne Duagani MasikaFaculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Education, Université de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, République Démocratique du Congo.
Jean-Bosco Kahindo MbevaDepartment of Public Health, Official University of Ruwenzori, Goma, North-Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health is mostly affected by numerous socioeconomic factors that need to be addressed through comprehensive strategies. The aftermath of armed conflict and natural disasters such as Ebola disease virus (EVD) outbreaks is frequently associated with poor access to mental healthcare. To design the basis of improving mental health services via the integration of mental health into primary health care in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), we conducted a scoping review of available literature regarding mental illness in armed conflict and EVD outbreak settings.

methodsThis scoping review of studies conducted in armed conflict and EVD outbreak of DRC settings synthesize the findings and suggestions related to improve the provision of mental health services. We sued the extension of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses to scoping studies. A mapping of evidence related to mental disorders in the eastern part of DRC from studies identified through searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, Psych Info, Google Scholar, and CINAHL). Screening and extraction of data were conducted by two reviewers independently.

resultsThis review identified seven papers and described the findings in a narrative approach. It reveals that the burden of mental illness is consistent, although mental healthcare is not integrated into primary health care. Access to mental healthcare requires the involvement of affected communities in their problem-solving process. This review highlights the basis of the implementation of a comprehensive mental health care, through the application of mental health Gap Action Program (mhGAP) at community level. Lastly, it calls for further implementation research perspectives on the integration of mental healthcare into the health system of areas affecting by civil instability and natural disasters.

conclusionThis paper acknowledges poor implementation of community mental health services into primary health care in regions affected by armed conflict and natural disasters. All relevant stakeholders involved in the provision of mental health services should need to rethink to implementation of mhGAP into the emergency response against outbreaks and natural disasters.

Indexed as

EbolavirusHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaMental Health ServicesArmed ConflictsDisease OutbreaksHumansArmed conflictDemocratic Republic of CongoEbolaMental healthMental health servicesScoping review

Identifiers

PMID35836283
PMCPMC9281256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.