Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35836251›Full record

ArticleIrish veterinary journal2022

Understanding the dog population in the Republic of Ireland: insight from existing data sources?

Simon J More, Daniel M Collins, Natascha V Meunier, Locksley L McV Messam, Rob Doyle, Aiden Maguire, Sean Murray, Patricia Reilly, Catherine Lawler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Irish veterinary journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Simon J MoreUCD Centre for Veterinary Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, D04 W6F6, Ireland. simon.more@ucd.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4270-0385
Daniel M CollinsUCD Centre for Veterinary Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, D04 W6F6, Ireland.
Natascha V MeunierAnimal Health Ireland, 4-5 The Archways, Carrick on Shannon, Co. Leitrim, N41 WN27, Ireland.
Locksley L McV MessamSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, D04 W6F6, Ireland.
Rob DoyleDepartment of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Kildare St, Dublin, D02 WK12, Ireland.
Aiden MaguireDepartment of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Kildare St, Dublin, D02 WK12, Ireland.
Sean MurrayDepartment of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Kildare St, Dublin, D02 WK12, Ireland.
Patricia ReillyDepartment of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Kildare St, Dublin, D02 WK12, Ireland.
Catherine LawlerDepartment of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Kildare St, Dublin, D02 WK12, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReliable information about national pet dog populations is an important contributor to informed decision-making, both by governments and national dog welfare organisations. In some countries, there is an improved understanding of aspects of the national pet dog population, but as yet limited published information is available in Ireland. The current study reviews the utility of existing data to inform our understanding of recent changes to the pet dog population in Ireland, including both biological and organisational processes.

resultsBased on national data on dog licencing and microchipping registration, pet dog numbers have remained relatively stable in recent years (ie prior to the COVID-19 pandemic). Since 2015, there has been a substantial decrease in the number of dogs managed through dog control centres. Although the completeness of the data are likely variable, there appears to be substantial, and increasing, number of dogs moving from Ireland to other countries, including UK, Sweden, Italy, Germany and Singapore. We also note an increase (albeit much smaller) in the number of dogs being moved into Ireland.

conclusionsThis study highlights the challenges faced when using existing national data to gain insights into the dog population of Ireland. The linking of existing national databases (individual dog identification, dog licencing, dog control statistics) has the potential to improve both the representativeness and accuracy of information about the Irish pet dog population. In the next phases of our work, we will focus on the work of dog welfare organisations, given both the increased role played by these organisations and the substantial public funding that has been committed in this sector.

Indexed as

Dog populationExisting databasesIrelandNational policyPet dogs

Identifiers

PMID35836251
PMCPMC9281166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.