Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35836193›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2022

Dignity and the provision of care and support in 'old age homes' in Tamil Nadu, India: a qualitative study.

Vanessa Burholt, E Zoe Shoemark, R Maruthakutti, Aabha Chaudhary, Carol Maddock

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Vanessa BurholtSchool of Nursing/School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Room 235B, Level 2, Building 505, 85 Park Road, Grafton, The University of Auckland Private Bag, 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. vanessa.burholt@auckland.ac.nz.
E Zoe ShoemarkCentre for Innovative Ageing, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK.
R MaruthakuttiDepartment of Sociology, Manonmanian Sundaranar University, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India.
Aabha ChaudharyAnugraha, Swabhiman Parisar, Kasturba Nagar, Shahdara, Delhi, India.
Carol MaddockCentre for Innovative Ageing, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK.
Swansea University · GBManonmaniam Sundaranar University · INUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2016, Tamil Nadu was the first state in India to develop a set of Minimum Standards for old age homes. The Minimum Standards stipulate that that residents' dignity and privacy should be respected. However, the concept of dignity is undefined in the Minimum Standards. To date, there has been very little research within old age homes exploring the dignity of residents. This study draws on the concepts of (i) status dignity and (ii) central human functional capabilities, to explore whether old age homes uphold the dignity of residents.

objectivesThe study was designed to obtain insights into human rights issues and experiences of residents, and the article addresses the research question, "to what extent do old age homes in Tamil Nadu support the central human functional capabilities of life, bodily health, bodily integrity and play, and secure dignity for older residents?".

methodA cross-sectional qualitative exploratory study design was utilised. Between January and May 2018 face-to-face interviews were conducted using a semi-structured topic guide with 30 older residents and 11 staff from ten care homes located three southern districts in Tamil Nadu, India. Framework analysis of data was structured around four central human functional capabilities.

resultsThere was considerable variation in the extent to which the four central human functional capabilities life, bodily integrity, bodily health and play were met. There was evidence that Articles 3, 13, 25 and 24 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights were contravened in both registered and unregistered facilities. Juxtaposing violations of human rights with good practice demonstrated that old age homes have the potential to protect the dignity of residents.

conclusionThe Government of India needs to strengthen old age home policies to protect residents. A new legislative framework is required to ensure that all old age homes are accountable to the State. Minimum Standards should include expectations for quality of care and dignity in care that meet the basic needs of residents and provide health care, personal support, and opportunities for leisure, and socializing. Standards should include staff-to-resident ratios and staff training requirements.

Indexed as

Homes for the AgedNursing HomesAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIndiaRespectCross-sectional studiesDelivery of health careIndiaLeisure activitiesLong-term carePrivacyReference standardsResidential careRespect

Identifiers

PMID35836193
PMCPMC9281159
OpenAlexW4285389265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.