ArticleBMC oral health2022
Validation of an implant stability measurement device using the percussion response: a clinical research study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early versus conventional loading for fully guided immediate implant placement in molar sites: a randomized controlled clinical study.International journal of implant dentistry · 2025Trial
- Clinical agreement between scale-aligned damping capacity and resonance frequency analyses for implant stability: a retrospective method-comparison study.Journal of periodontal & implant science · 2026Article
- A Predictive Bioengineering Model of Dental Implant Instability in Systemic Bone Disorders: A Periotest-Based Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Photobiomodulation in dental implant stability and post-surgical healing: A clinical study.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Stability of dental implants using AnyCheck and Osstell devices.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Application of CAD-CAM 3D Technology in Designing a Molar Distalization Device with Skeletal Anchorage: A Case Report.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of osteointegration in photostimulated dental implants: 650-976 nm diode lasers versus growth factors.Journal of medicine and life · 2024Article
- Effects of restraint stress and surface treatments on the stability of titanium dental implant osseointegration in dogs: An in vivo comparative study.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2024Article
- Influencing factors and evaluation methods for early stability of immediate implant.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024Review
- Dependability of Osstell ISQ's for measuring implant stability.Bioinformation · 2024Article
- The Influence of Implant Macro-geometry in Primary Stability in Low-Density Bone: AnJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral devices have been developed to measure implant-bone stability as an indicator of successful implant treatment; these include Osstell®, which measures the implant stability quotient (ISQ), and the more recent AnyCheck®, which relies on percussion for the implant stability test (IST). These devices make it possible to measure implant stability. However, no studies have compared the performance of AnyCheck® and Osstell® (i.e., IST and ISQ values) in clinical practice. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the correlation between primary and secondary implant stability using the Osstell® and AnyCheck® devices.
methodsTen patients (7 women; age [mean ± standard deviation]: 49.1 ± 13.3 years) with partially edentulous jaws who received a total of 15 implants were included. IST (AnyCheck®) and ISQ (Osstell®) values were measured immediately after implantation and at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 weeks post-implantation. Each measurement was performed three times, and the average value was used as the result. The correlation between measurements obtained using the two devices was determined using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.
resultsThe IST values ranged from 79.1 ± 2.87 to 82.4 ± 2.65. The ISQ values ranged from 76.0 ± 2.8 to 80.2 ± 2.35. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was r = 0.64 immediately after implantation, r = 0.29 at 1 week, r = 0.68 at 2 weeks, r = 0.53 at 3 weeks, r = 0.68 at 4 weeks, and r = 0.56 at 6 weeks. A positive correlation was found in all cases, except at week 1 when the correlation was weak; the IST and ISQ values decreased the most during the first postoperative week and increased during the second week. The IST values were also slightly higher at all measurement points.
conclusionThe ability to assess implant stability without removing the abutment during healing is essential for determining the timing of loading without the risk of bone resorption. The results of this study suggest that AnyCheck® is useful for determining primary and secondary implant stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.