Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35836124›Full record

ArticleClinical proteomics2022

Comparative proteomic analysis of glomerular proteins in primary and bucillamine-induced membranous nephropathy.

Hajime Kaga, Hirotoshi Matsumura, Takehiro Suzuki, Naoshi Dohmae, Masafumi Odaka, Atsushi Komatsuda, Naoto Takahashi, Hideki Wakui

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical proteomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hajime KagaDepartment of Hematology, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Hirotoshi MatsumuraDepartment of Life Science, Graduate School of Engineering Science, Akita University, 1-1 Tegatagakuen-machi, Akita City, Akita, 010-8502, Japan. matsumuh@gipc.akita-u.ac.jp.
Takehiro SuzukiBiomolecular Characterization Unit, RIKEN Center for Sustainable Research Science, Wako, Japan.
Naoshi DohmaeBiomolecular Characterization Unit, RIKEN Center for Sustainable Research Science, Wako, Japan.
Masafumi OdakaDepartment of Life Science, Graduate School of Engineering Science, Akita University, 1-1 Tegatagakuen-machi, Akita City, Akita, 010-8502, Japan.
Atsushi KomatsudaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ogachi Central Hospital, Yuzawa, Japan.
Naoto TakahashiDepartment of Hematology, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Hideki WakuiDepartment of Life Science, Graduate School of Engineering Science, Akita University, 1-1 Tegatagakuen-machi, Akita City, Akita, 010-8502, Japan.
Akita University · JPRIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science · JP

Funding

Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science 19K08694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnti-phospholipase A2 receptor autoantibody (PLA2R Ab)-associated membranous nephropathy (MN) is the most common form of primary MN (pMN). On the other hand, bucillamine (BCL), an antirheumatic drug developed in Japan, was reported to cause a rare form of secondary MN (sMN). Between these MN forms, comparative proteomic analysis of glomerular proteins has not been performed.

methodsWe used renal biopsy specimens from 6 patients with PLA2R Ab (+) pMN, 6 patients with PLA2R Ab (‒) pMN, 6 patients with BCL-induced sMN, and 5 control cases (time 0 transplant biopsies). Proteins were extracted from laser-microdissected glomeruli and analyzed using mass spectrometry. The quantification values of protein abundance in each MN group were compared with those in the control group.

resultsMore than 800 proteins with high confidence were identified. Principal component analysis revealed a different distribution between the pMN and sMN groups. For further analysis, 441 proteins matched with ≥ 3 peptides were selected. Among the pMN and sMN groups, we compared the profiles of several protein groups based on the structural and functional characteristics, such as immunoglobulins, complements, complement-regulating proteins, podocyte-associated proteins, glomerular basement membrane proteins, and several proteins that are known to be associated with kidney diseases, including MN. In all MN groups, increased levels of immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, and IgM), complements (C3, C4, and C9), complement factor H-related protein 5, type XVIII collagen, calmodulin, polyubiquitin, and ubiquitin ligase were observed. For some proteins, such as type VII collagen and nestin, the fold-change values were significantly different between the pMN and sMN groups.

conclusionsBetween the pMN and BCL-induced sMN groups, we observed common and different alterations in protein levels such as known disease-associated proteins and potential disease marker proteins.

Indexed as

BucillamineComparative proteomic analysisGlomerular proteinsLaser microdissectionMass spectrometryMembranous nephropathy

Identifiers

PMID35836124
PMCPMC9281048
OpenAlexW4285385932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.