ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022
Impaired time-distance reconfiguration patterns in Alzheimer's disease: a dynamic functional connectivity study with 809 individuals from 7 sites.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Macroscale Gradient Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease: Patterns With Cognition Terms and Gene Expression Profiles.Human brain mapping · 2024Pooled it
- Mild cognitive impairment prediction based on multi-stream convolutional neural networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Altered large-scale dynamic connectivity patterns in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment patients: A machine learning study.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) has been used successfully to investigate the dysfunction of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. The reconfiguration intensity of nodal dFC, which means the degree of alteration between FCs at different time scales, could provide additional information for understanding the reconfiguration of brain connectivity.
resultsIn this paper, we introduced a feature named time distance nodal connectivity diversity (tdNCD), and then evaluated the network reconfiguration intensity in every specific brain region in AD using a large multicenter dataset (N = 809 from 7 independent sites). Our results showed that the dysfunction involved in three subnetworks in AD, including the default mode network (DMN), the subcortical network (SCN), and the cerebellum network (CBN). The nodal tdNCD inside the DMN increased in AD compared to normal controls, and the nodal dynamic FC of the SCN and the CBN decreased in AD. Additionally, the classification analysis showed that the classification performance was better when combined tdNCD and FC to classify AD from normal control (ACC = 81%, SEN = 83.4%, SPE = 80.6%, and F1-score = 79.4%) than that only using FC (ACC = 78.2%, SEN = 76.2%, SPE = 76.5%, and F1-score = 77.5%) with a leave-one-site-out cross-validation. Besides, the performance of the three classes classification was improved from 50% (only using FC) to 53.3% (combined FC and tdNCD) (macro F1-score accuracy from 46.8 to 48.9%). More importantly, the classification model showed significant clinically predictive correlations (two classes classification: R = -0.38, P < 0.001; three classes classification: R = -0.404, P < 0.001). More importantly, several commonly used machine learning models confirmed that the tdNCD would provide additional information for classifying AD from normal controls.
conclusionsThe present study demonstrated dynamic reconfiguration of nodal FC abnormities in AD. The tdNCD highlights the potential for further understanding core mechanisms of brain dysfunction in AD. Evaluating the tdNCD FC provides a promising way to understand AD processes better and investigate novel diagnostic brain imaging biomarkers for AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.