Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35836031›Full record

Observational studyArchives of osteoporosis2022

Prevalence and treatment of fragility fractures in Spanish primary care: PREFRAOS study.

Daniel Martínez-Laguna, Cristina Carbonell, José-Carlos Bastida, Milagros González, Rafael M Micó-Pérez, Francisco Vargas, Mónica Balcells-Oliver, Laura Canals, PREFRAOS Group

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Archives of osteoporosis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel Martínez-LagunaHealth Center Sant Martí de Provençals, C/Fluvià 211, 08020, Barcelona, Spain. 34859dml@comb.cat.
Cristina CarbonellGREMPAL Research Group, IDIAP Jordi Gol, Barcelona, Spain.
José-Carlos BastidaHealth Center of Marín, Pontevedra, Spain.
Milagros GonzálezHealth Center of Montesa, Madrid, Spain.
Rafael M Micó-PérezHealth Center of Fontanars dels Alforins, EAP Ontinyent, Valencia, Spain.
Francisco VargasHealth Center Dr. Guigou, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Mónica Balcells-OliverMedical Department, Amgen, Barcelona, Spain.
Laura CanalsMedical Department, Amgen, Switzerland.
PREFRAOS Group
Amgen (Switzerland) · CHInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol · ESMadrid Health Service · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Spanish primary care (PC), the prevalence of fragility fractures (FF) in subjects ≥ 70 years old is high, especially in women. One-third of subjects with an FF lacked osteoporosis (OP) diagnosis and >50% were not currently receiving OP medication. An improvement of the FF management in this population is needed. PURPOSE: In Spanish PC, the prevalence of FF is high, especially in women. One-third of subjects with a FF lacked an OP diagnosis and more than half were not currently receiving OP medication. Several studies reported underdiagnosis/undertreatment of OP in PC among elderly subjects with FF. To date, no such data exist for Spain. The purpose is to estimate the prevalence of FF in the elderly population (≥ 70 years old) and to describe the characteristics, risk factors, comorbidities, and OP diagnosis and treatment rates of subjects with FF in Spanish PC centers.

methodsThis is an observational, retrospective study in Spain consisting of two phases. Phase A included all subjects ≥ 70 years old listed in the center's medical records from November 2018 to March 2020. Phase B included subjects with FF and prior consultation at the center for any reason. Subjects were excluded only if they had previously participated in another study. Primary outcomes were prevalence of FF (phase A) and characteristics of subjects with at least one FF (phase B).

resultsThe overall prevalence of FF was 17.7% among subjects visiting medical centers for any reason (24.1% women vs. 8.0% men) (30 PC centers from 14 Spanish regions). Vertebral (5.1%) was the most prevalent fracture. Of 665 subjects in phase B, most (87%) were women and ≥ 80 years old (57%), suffered mainly major OP fracture (68%), and had multiple comorbidities (≥ 2, 89.2%). While two-thirds had OP diagnosis and 61.1% received OP medication anytime in the past, 56.8% were not currently receiving OP medication. Diagnosis and treatment rates were lower among men (43% and 38% vs. 70% and 65%, respectively).

conclusionPrevalence of FF was high, especially in women. One-third of subjects lacked OP diagnosis and ≥ 50% were not receiving OP treatment; diagnosis and treatment gaps were larger among men. This reinforces the need to improve the management of FF in the elderly population. However, as PC centers participating in this study had high OP experience that have the potential to do better in terms of diagnosis and treatment, caution in the generalization of these data should be taken.

Indexed as

OsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMalePrevalencePrimary Health CareRetrospective StudiesDiagnosticFragility fractureOsteoporosisPrevalencePrimary careTreatment

Identifiers

PMID35836031
PMCPMC9283348
OpenAlexW4285492156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.