Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35835965›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2023

Distinct and Temporally Stable Assembly Mechanisms Shape Bacterial and Fungal Communities in Vineyard Soils.

Stefano Larsen, Davide Albanese, James Stegen, Pietro Franceschi, E Coller, Roberto Zanzotti, Claudio Ioriatti, Erika Stefani, Massimo Pindo, Alessandro Cestaro and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Stefano LarsenResearch and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, via E. Mach 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, Italy. stefano.larsen@fmach.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6774-1407
Davide AlbaneseResearch and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, via E. Mach 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.
James StegenPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Pietro FranceschiResearch and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, via E. Mach 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.
E CollerTechnology Transfer Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, via E. Mach 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, Italia.
Roberto ZanzottiTechnology Transfer Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, via E. Mach 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, Italia.
Claudio IoriattiTechnology Transfer Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, via E. Mach 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, Italia.
Erika StefaniResearch and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, via E. Mach 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.
Massimo PindoResearch and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, via E. Mach 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.
Alessandro CestaroResearch and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, via E. Mach 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.
Claudio DonatiResearch and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, via E. Mach 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial communities in agricultural soils are fundamental for plant growth and in vineyard ecosystems contribute to defining regional wine quality. Managing soil microbes towards beneficial outcomes requires knowledge of how community assembly processes vary across taxonomic groups, spatial scales, and through time. However, our understanding of microbial assembly remains limited. To quantify the contributions of stochastic and deterministic processes to bacterial and fungal assembly across spatial scales and through time, we used 16 s rRNA gene and ITS sequencing in the soil of an emblematic wine-growing region of Italy.Combining null- and neutral-modelling, we found that assembly processes were consistent through time, but bacteria and fungi were governed by different processes. At the within-vineyard scale, deterministic selection and homogenising dispersal dominated bacterial assembly, while neither selection nor dispersal had clear influence over fungal assembly. At the among-vineyard scale, the influence of dispersal limitation increased for both taxonomic groups, but its contribution was much larger for fungal communities. These null-model-based inferences were supported by neutral modelling, which estimated a dispersal rate almost two orders-of-magnitude lower for fungi than bacteria.This indicates that while stochastic processes are important for fungal assembly, bacteria were more influenced by deterministic selection imposed by the biotic and/or abiotic environment. Managing microbes in vineyard soils could thus benefit from strategies that account for dispersal limitation of fungi and the importance of environmental conditions for bacteria. Our results are consistent with theoretical expectations whereby larger individual size and smaller populations can lead to higher levels of stochasticity.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaMycobiomeBacteriaFungiSoilSoil MicrobiologySoilAgricultureBeta-diversityNeutral modelsNull modelsSpatial scalesStochasticity

Identifiers

PMID35835965
PMCPMC10293400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.