Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35835933›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Area-based breast percentage density estimation in mammograms using weight-adaptive multitask learning.

Naga Raju Gudhe, Hamid Behravan, Mazen Sudah, Hidemi Okuma, Ritva Vanninen, Veli-Matti Kosma, Arto Mannermaa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Naga Raju GudheInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Multidisciplinary Cancer Research community, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, 70211, Kuopio, Finland. raju.gudhe@uef.fi.
Hamid BehravanInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Multidisciplinary Cancer Research community, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, 70211, Kuopio, Finland. hamid.behravan@uef.fi.
Mazen SudahDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 100, 70029, Kuopio, Finland.
Hidemi OkumaDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 100, 70029, Kuopio, Finland.
Ritva VanninenDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 100, 70029, Kuopio, Finland.
Veli-Matti Kosma *Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Multidisciplinary Cancer Research community, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, 70211, Kuopio, Finland.
Arto Mannermaa *Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Multidisciplinary Cancer Research community, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, 70211, Kuopio, Finland.
Kuopio University Hospital · FIUniversity of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast density, which is a measure of the relative amount of fibroglandular tissue within the breast area, is one of the most important breast cancer risk factors. Accurate segmentation of fibroglandular tissues and breast area is crucial for computing the breast density. Semiautomatic and fully automatic computer-aided design tools have been developed to estimate the percentage of breast density in mammograms. However, the available approaches are usually limited to specific mammogram views and are inadequate for complete delineation of the pectoral muscle. These tools also perform poorly in cases of data variability and often require an experienced radiologist to adjust the segmentation threshold for fibroglandular tissue within the breast area. This study proposes a new deep learning architecture that automatically estimates the area-based breast percentage density from mammograms using a weight-adaptive multitask learning approach. The proposed approach simultaneously segments the breast and dense tissues and further estimates the breast percentage density. We evaluate the performance of the proposed model in both segmentation and density estimation on an independent evaluation set of 7500 craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique-view mammograms from Kuopio University Hospital, Finland. The proposed multitask segmentation approach outperforms and achieves average relative improvements of 2.88% and 9.78% in terms of F-score compared to the multitask U-net and a fully convolutional neural network, respectively. The estimated breast density values using our approach strongly correlate with radiologists' assessments with a Pearson's correlation of [Formula: see text] (95% confidence interval [0.89, 0.91]). We conclude that our approach greatly improves the segmentation accuracy of the breast area and dense tissues; thus, it can play a vital role in accurately computing the breast density. Our density estimation model considerably reduces the time and effort needed to estimate density values from mammograms by radiologists and therefore, decreases inter- and intra-reader variability.

Indexed as

Breast DensityBreast NeoplasmsBreastFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMammographyNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID35835933
PMCPMC9283472
OpenAlexW4285390975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.