Trial reportOral and maxillofacial surgery2023
Nebulized hyaluronic acid improves nasal symptoms after orthognathic surgery: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Part II - imidazolines and rhinitis medicamentosa: how can we tackle the rebound dilemma?Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAfter maxillary osteotomy in orthognathic surgery, patients report nasal breathing discomfort in early postoperative period. Topical hyaluronic acid (HA) has been proven to have beneficial effects on the upper airway tract mucosa. This prospective randomized controlled study was designed to analyze the effect on nasal obstruction of nebulized HA during the recovery process after maxillary osteotomy.
methodsPatients were randomized to control and treatment groups. The postoperative treatment differed only for additional nebulized HA provided to the treatment group. The level of nasal obstruction, and its impact on quality of life, was assessed every 3 days for the first 15 days postoperatively using a questionnaire. Demographic and other variables (maxillary osteotomy type and surgical movements) were analyzed. Differences in quantitative data were tested using Student's t-test, the Mann-Whitney U test, and mixed repeated measures ANOVA.
resultsTwenty-four subjects were included in each group; differences in age, sex, type of maxillary osteotomy, and movements were non-statistically significative. At the beginning of treatment (T0), the two groups had comparable questionnaire scores regarding nasal breathing discomfort (p >0.05), whereas statistically significant differences were found at days 3, 6, 9, and 12 (p <0.05). A significant decrease in nasal breathing discomfort over time was observed in both groups, with trends that differed between the two, indicating faster improvement in the treatment group.
conclusionNebulized HA can be a useful additional treatment in early postoperative period after orthognathic surgery. Patients reported more rapid improvement of nasal respiratory symptoms, indicating a potential role for HA in reducing recovery time and patient discomfort after maxillary surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.