Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35835900›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2022

The role of MBL, PCT, CRP, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet lymphocyte ratio in differentiating infections from flares in lupus.

Balaji Musunuri, Rina Tripathy, Sunali Padhi, Aditya K Panda, Bidyut K Das

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Advances in the lectin pathway in systemic lupus erythematosus: from clinical correlations and mechanisms to targeted interventions.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Balaji Musunuri *Department of Medicine, S.C.B. Medical College, Cuttack, 753007, Odisha, India.
Rina Tripathy *Department of Biochemistry, SVP Post-Graduate Institute of Pediatrics, Cuttack, Odisha, India.
Sunali PadhiDepartment of Biotechnology, Berhampur University, Bhanja Bihar, Berhampur, Odisha, India, 760007.
Aditya K PandaDepartment of Biotechnology, Berhampur University, Bhanja Bihar, Berhampur, Odisha, India, 760007. adityarmrc@gmail.com.
Bidyut K DasDepartment of Medicine, S.C.B. Medical College, Cuttack, 753007, Odisha, India. bidyutdas@hotmail.com.
Berhampur University · INSriram Chandra Bhanja Medical College Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe distinction between infection and flare in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has always been a dilemma for clinicians as the clinical and biochemical profiles overlap. The present study evaluated affordable biomarkers to distinguish infection from flare in an SLE cohort in a tertiary care center in eastern India.

methodsOne hundred and fifty-two SLE patients were clinically evaluated and enrolled in the present study. Hematological, immunological, and biochemical profiles and various biomarkers such as C reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and Mannose-binding lectin (MBL) were quantified.

resultsOne hundred and fifty-two patients (152) were enrolled in the present study and all had SLEDAI scores of more than 4. From which 70 had infection, and the common infections were urinary tract infection (34.28%) followed by pneumonia (27.14%). Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were significantly elevated in SLE with infections (NLR: 5.84 ± 2.47; CRP: 30.56 ± 41.63) than those with flare (NLR: 3.87 ± 2.62; CRP: 8.73 ± 9.53). The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis revealed CRP, PLR, and NLR as important markers for predicting infections (CRP: AUC = 0.682, p = 0.0001; PLR: AUC = 0.668, p = 0.0008; NLR: AUC = 0.742, p < 0.0001). The MBL and PCT levels were comparable among SLE flare and those with infections.

conclusionsNLR and CRP levels are affordable biomarkers to distinguish infections from flares in SLE. MBL and PCT could not differentiate flare from an infection. Key Points • Biomarkers for the differentiation of infection and flare in SLE are limited. • NLR, PLR, and CRP are promising biomarkers to enable differentiation. • PCT and MBL are not ideal biomarkers to differentiate infection from flare.

Indexed as

Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicNeutrophilsBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinHumansLymphocytesProcalcitoninRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinProcalcitoninBiomarkersC reactive proteinFlareInfectionMannose-binding lectinNeutrophil–lymphocyte ratioPCTSystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID35835900
OpenAlexW4285495618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.