Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35835892›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2022

External validation of the deep learning system "SpineNet" for grading radiological features of degeneration on MRIs of the lumbar spine.

Alexandra Grob, Markus Loibl, Amir Jamaludin, Sebastian Winklhofer, Jeremy C T Fairbank, Tamás Fekete, François Porchet, Anne F Mannion

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Artificial intelligence for segmentation and classification in lumbar spinal stenosis: an overview of current methods.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Are current machine learning applications comparable to radiologist classification of degenerate and herniated discs and Modic change? A systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Advances and challenges in AI-assisted MRI for lumbar disc degeneration detection and classification.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  8. External validation of SpineNetv2 deep learning system for automated lumbar spine MRI analysis: A multi-pathology diagnostic agreement study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Comparison of lumbar disc degeneration grading between deep learning model SpineNet and radiologist: a longitudinal study with a 14-year follow-up.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Deep learning in rheumatological image interpretation.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2024
    Review
  20. A deep learning-based technique for the diagnosis of epidural spinal cord compression on thoracolumbar CT.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexandra GrobDepartment of Spine Surgery and Neurosurgery, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland. grob.alexandra@gmx.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0850-783X
Markus LoiblDepartment of Spine Surgery and Neurosurgery, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7631-0476
Amir JamaludinDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sebastian WinklhoferDepartment of Neuroradiology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jeremy C T FairbankNuffield Department of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Tamás FeketeDepartment of Spine Surgery and Neurosurgery, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5231-5600
François PorchetDepartment of Spine Surgery and Neurosurgery, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland.
Anne F MannionDepartment of Teaching, Research and Development, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1203-1096
Schulthess-Klinik · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used to detect degenerative changes of the lumbar spine. SpineNet (SN), a computer vision-based system, performs an automated analysis of degenerative features in MRI scans aiming to provide high accuracy, consistency and objectivity. This study evaluated SN's ratings compared with those of an expert radiologist.

methodMRIs of 882 patients (mean age, 72 ± 8.8 years) with degenerative spinal disorders from two previous trials carried out in our spine center between 2011 and 2019, were analyzed by an expert radiologist. Lumbar segments (L1/2-L5/S1) were graded for Pfirrmann Grades (PG), Spondylolisthesis (SL) and Central Canal Stenosis (CCS). SN's analysis for the equivalent parameters was generated. Agreement between methods was analyzed using kappa (κ), Spearman correlation (ρ) and Lin's concordance correlation (ρ

results4410 lumbar segments were analyzed. κ statistics showed moderate to substantial agreement in PG between the radiologist and SN depending on spinal level (range κ 0.63-0.77, all levels together 0.72; range CAA 45-68%, all levels 55%), slight to substantial agreement for SL (range κ 0.07-0.60, all levels 0.63; range CAA 47-57%, all levels 56%) and CCS (range κ 0.17-0.57, all levels 0.60; range CAA 35-41%, all levels 43%). SN tended to record more pathological features in PG than did the radiologist whereas the contrary was the case for CCS. SL showed an even distribution between methods.

conclusionSN is a robust and reliable tool with the ability to grade degenerative features such as PG, SL or CCS in lumbar MRIs with moderate to substantial agreement compared to the current gold-standard, the radiologist. It is a valuable alternative for analyzing MRIs from large cohorts for diagnostic and research purposes.

Indexed as

Deep LearningIntervertebral Disc DegenerationSpondylolisthesisAgedAged, 80 and overConstriction, PathologicHumansLumbar VertebraeLumbosacral RegionMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedAutomated softwareDegenerative spinal disordersDiagnostic imagingDisc degenerationInter-rater agreementMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID35835892
OpenAlexW4285388216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.