Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35835885›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2023

A Sensibility Assessment of the Job Demands and Accommodation Planning Tool (JDAPT): A Tool to Help Workers with an Episodic Disability Plan Workplace Support.

Monique A M Gignac, Julie Bowring, Sabrina Tonima, Renee-Louise Franche, Aaron Thompson, Arif Jetha, Peter M Smith, Joy C Macdermid, William S Shaw, Dwayne Van Eerd and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Monique A M GignacInstitute for Work and Health, 400 University Avenue, Suite 1800, Toronto, ON, M5G 1S5, Canada. mgignac@iwh.on.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-4445-3274
Julie BowringInstitute for Work and Health, 400 University Avenue, Suite 1800, Toronto, ON, M5G 1S5, Canada.
Sabrina TonimaInstitute for Work and Health, 400 University Avenue, Suite 1800, Toronto, ON, M5G 1S5, Canada.
Renee-Louise FrancheWorkSafeBC, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Aaron ThompsonWorkplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB), Toronto, ON, Canada.
Arif JethaInstitute for Work and Health, 400 University Avenue, Suite 1800, Toronto, ON, M5G 1S5, Canada.
Peter M SmithInstitute for Work and Health, 400 University Avenue, Suite 1800, Toronto, ON, M5G 1S5, Canada.
Joy C MacdermidSchool of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
William S ShawMedicine, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, CT, USA.
Dwayne Van EerdInstitute for Work and Health, 400 University Avenue, Suite 1800, Toronto, ON, M5G 1S5, Canada.
Dorcas E BeatonInstitute for Work and Health, 400 University Avenue, Suite 1800, Toronto, ON, M5G 1S5, Canada.
Emma IrvinInstitute for Work and Health, 400 University Avenue, Suite 1800, Toronto, ON, M5G 1S5, Canada.
Emile TompaInstitute for Work and Health, 400 University Avenue, Suite 1800, Toronto, ON, M5G 1S5, Canada.
Ron SaundersInstitute for Work and Health, 400 University Avenue, Suite 1800, Toronto, ON, M5G 1S5, Canada.

Funding

CIHR #890-2016-3002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Sensibility refers to a tool's comprehensiveness, understandability, relevance, feasibility, and length. It is used in the early development phase to begin assessing a new tool or intervention. This study examined the sensibility of the job demands and accommodation planning tool (JDAPT). The JDAPT identifies job demands related to physical, cognitive, interpersonal, and working conditions to better target strategies for workplace supports and accommodations aimed at assisting individuals with chronic health conditions. Methods Workers with a chronic health condition and workplace representatives were recruited from health charities, workplaces, and newsletters using convenience sampling. Cognitive interviews assessed the JDAPT's sensibility. A 70% endorsement rate was the minimum level of acceptability for sensibility concepts. A short screening tool also was administered, and answers compared to the complete JDAPT. Results Participants were 46 workers and 23 organizational representatives (n = 69). Endorsements highly exceeded the 70% cut-off for understandability, relevance, and length. Congruence between screening questions and the complete JDAPT suggested both workers and organizational representatives overlooked job demands when completing the screener. Participants provided additional examples and three new items to improve comprehensiveness. The JDAPT was rated highly relevant and useful, although not always easy to complete for someone with an episodic condition. Conclusions This study highlights the need for tools that facilitate accommodations for workers with episodic disabilities and provides early evidence for the sensibility of the JDAPT.

Indexed as

Persons with DisabilitiesWorkplaceHumansAccommodationsDisabilityEmploymentMeasurementSupport

Identifiers

PMID35835885
PMCPMC9282615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.