Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35835850›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Comparative efficacy of phosphorous supplements with phosphate solubilizing bacteria for optimizing wheat yield in calcareous soils.

Muhammad Adnan, Shah Fahad, Muhammad Hamzah Saleem, Baber Ali, Maria Mussart, Rafi Ullah, Amanullah, Muhammad Arif, Manzoor Ahmad, Wajid Ali Shah and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria,Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 13 institutions in 5 countries.

Muhammad AdnanDepartment of Agriculture, The University of Swabi, Swabi, 23561, Pakistan. madnan@uoswabi.edu.pk.
Shah FahadHainan Key Laboratory for Sustainable Utilization of Tropical Bioresource, College of Tropical Crops, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, Hainan, China. shah_fahad80@yahoo.com.
Muhammad Hamzah SaleemCollege of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Baber AliDepartment of Plant Sciences, Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan.
Maria MussartDepartment of Soil and Environmental Sciences, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Rafi UllahDepartment of Agriculture, The University of Swabi, Swabi, 23561, Pakistan.
AmanullahDepartment of Agronomy, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Muhammad ArifDepartment of Agronomy, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Manzoor AhmadDepartment of Agriculture, Bacha Khan University, Charsadda, Pakistan.
Wajid Ali ShahDepartment of Agriculture, Bacha Khan University, Charsadda, Pakistan.
Muhammad RommanDepartment of Botany, University of Chitral, Chitral, Pakistan.
Fazli WahidDepartment of Agriculture, The University of Swabi, Swabi, 23561, Pakistan.
Depeng WangCollege of Life Science, Linyi University, Linyi, 276000, Shandong, China.
Shah SaudCollege of Life Science, Linyi University, Linyi, 276000, Shandong, China. saudhort@gmail.com.
Ke LiuHubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Grain Industry/Agriculture College, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, 434025, Hubei, China.
Matthew Tom HarrisonTasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Burnie, TAS, 7250, Australia.
Chao WuGuangxi Key Laboratory of Functional Phytochemicals Research and Utilization, Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guilin, 541006, China.
Subhan DanishDepartment of Soil Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, 60800, Pakistan.
Rahul DattaDepartment of Geology and Pedology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, 61300, Brno, Czech Republic.
Crina Carmen MuresanFood Engineering Department, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, 3-5 Calea Mănă ̧stur Street, 400372, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Romina Alina MarcFood Engineering Department, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, 3-5 Calea Mănă ̧stur Street, 400372, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. romina.vlaic@usamvcluj.ro.
The University of Agriculture, Peshawar · PKUniversity of Swabi · PKBacha Khan University · PKLinyi University · CNUniversity of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca · ROBahauddin Zakariya University · PKChinese Academy of Sciences · CNHainan University · CNHuazhong Agricultural University · CNMendel University in Brno · CZQuaid-i-Azam University · PKUniversity of Tasmania · AUYangtze University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) deficiency is the main hurdle in achieving sustainable crop production ps especially in calcareous soils. Using bio-fertilizers like phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) could be a useful approach for sustainable P management as they improve P availability in soil via dissolution, desorption and mineralization reactions. In addition, application of organic amendments with PSB could further ameliorate soil conditions for sustainable management of immobilized nutrients in calcarious soils. Therefore, we performed pot experiment to study the role of PSB in nullifying antagonistic effects of liming (4.78, 10, 15 and 20%) on P availability from poultry manure (PM), farm yard manure (FYM), single super phosphate (SSP) and rock phosphate (RP) in alkaline soils. PSB inoculation improved wheat growth, P availability and stimulated soil acidification over control regardless of P sources and lime levels. Soil calcification adversely affected plant growth, P nutrition, induced soil salinity and alkalinity, however, PSB and manures application potentially nullified such harmful effects over mentioned traits. Individually, organic sources were superior than mineral sources however, the performance of mineral fertilizers with PSB was at par to sole application of manures. Furthermore, application of RP with PSB proved as effective as sole SSP. Therefore, using PSB as bio-fertilizer has huge potential for improving P availability in calcareous soils.

Indexed as

FertilizersSoilBacteriaManurePhosphatesPhosphorusTriticumFertilizersManurePhosphatesPhosphorusSoil

Identifiers

PMID35835850
PMCPMC9283399
OpenAlexW4285390687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.