Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35835782›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Sensory processing sensitivity and somatosensory brain activation when feeling touch.

Michael Schaefer, Anja Kühnel, Matti Gärtner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Correction.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Brain circuits in autonomous sensory meridian response and related phenomena.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. The role of environmental sensitivity in the experience and processing of emotions: implications for well-being.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael SchaeferMedical School Berlin, Rüdesheimer Str. 50, 14197, Berlin, Germany. michael.schaefer@medicalschool-berlin.de.
Anja KühnelMedical School Berlin, Rüdesheimer Str. 50, 14197, Berlin, Germany.
Matti GärtnerMedical School Berlin, Rüdesheimer Str. 50, 14197, Berlin, Germany.
MSB Medical School Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory processing sensitivity is described as a personality trait associated with a high sensitivity to environmental and social stimuli. It has been assumed that about 15-20% of the total population can be described as highly sensitive. The concept states that those individuals represent a higher sensitivity to subtle stimuli, thereby exhibiting a different somatic sensation. Here we aim to test the assumption that the brain's sensory perception is different in individuals with high sensory processing sensitivity. We used a German version of the Highly Sensitive Person scale to measure sensory processing sensitivity. Furthermore, we assessed the Big Five personality dimensions and trait empathy (using IRI). To test the hypothesis that the brain's handling of sensory information is different in individuals with high sensory-processing sensitivity, we scanned participant's brain activity with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while they were touched by an experimenter's hand. Results showed positive correlations of sensory processing sensitivity with neuroticism, openness, and empathy. Introversion was not a significant predictor. Neuroimaging data demonstrated that sensory processing sensitivity (controlled for associated personality dimensions) was not related to primary or secondary somatosensory BOLD responses, but positively associated with BOLD activity in left posterior insular cortex. Based on these results we conclude that sensory processing sensitivity seems to represent insula-mediated affective touch. We discuss these results with previous studies reporting an engagement of the insula in individuals with high sensory processing sensitivity.

Indexed as

TouchTouch PerceptionBrainBrain MappingEmotionsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSomatosensory Cortex

Identifiers

PMID35835782
PMCPMC9283459
OpenAlexW4285390906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.