ArticleSeminars in perinatology2022
Contributions of the NICHD neonatal research network's generic database to documenting and advancing the outcomes of extremely preterm infants.
Article in Seminars in perinatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changes in mortality in very preterm neonates in a single institution in Dallas, Texas, 1977-2024: a cohort study.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Comparison of outcomes between thoracostomy and non-thoracostomy management in patients undergoing esophageal atresia surgery: a retrospective study in a tertiary care center (2018-2021).Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Factors associated with enrollment in a randomized clinical trial of docosahexaenoic supplementation in toddlers born preterm.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2026Article
- Impact analysis and evaluation of the Ethiopian Neonatal Network.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Outcomes of Infants Born at 21 Weeks' Gestational Age.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Predictors of CPAP failure after less-invasive surfactant administration in preterm infants.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network (NRN) maintains a database of extremely preterm infants known as the Generic Database (GDB). Begun in 1987, this database now includes more than 91,000 infants, most of whom are extremely preterm (<29 weeks gestation). The GDB has been the backbone of the NRN, providing high quality, prospectively collected data to study the changing epidemiology of extreme prematurity and its outcomes over time. In addition, GDB data have been used to generate hypotheses for prospective studies and to develop new clinical trials by providing information about the numbers and characteristics of available subjects and the expected event rates for conditions and complications to be studied. Since its inception, the GDB has been the basis of more than 200 publications in peer-reviewed journals, many of which have had a significant impact on the field of neonatology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.