Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35835588›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied microbiology2022

Metabolic phenotyping of acquired ampicillin resistance using microbial volatiles from Escherichia coli cultures.

Breanna Dixon, Waqar M Ahmed, Abubaker A Mohamed, Tim Felton, Stephen J Fowler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Microbial volatile organic compounds and olfactory receptors in wound malodor.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rapid Identification of Carbapenem-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Breanna DixonDivision of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4286-1410
Waqar M AhmedDivision of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1490-6391
Abubaker A MohamedManchester Institute of Biotechnology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9184-7861
Tim FeltonDivision of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6868-6633
Stephen J FowlerDivision of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4524-1663

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M011208/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T008725/1NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study sought to assess the volatile organic compound (VOC) profiles of ampicillin-resistant and -susceptible Escherichia coli to evaluate whether VOC analysis may be utilized to identify resistant phenotypes. METHODS AND

resultsAn E. coli BL21 (DE3) strain and its pET16b plasmid transformed ampicillin-resistant counterpart were cultured for 6 h in drug-free, low- and high-concentrations of ampicillin. Headspace analysis was undertaken using thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Results revealed distinct VOC profiles with ampicillin-resistant bacteria distinguishable from their susceptible counterparts using as few as six compounds. A minimum of 30 compounds (fold change >2, p ≤ 0.05) were differentially expressed between the strains across all set-ups. Furthermore, three compounds (indole, acetoin and 3-methyl-1-butanol) were observed to be significantly more abundant (fold change >2, p ≤ 0.05) in the resistant strain compared to the susceptible strain both in the presence and in the absence of drug stress.

conclusionsResults indicate that E. coli with acquired ampicillin resistance exhibit an altered VOC profile compared to their susceptible counterpart both in the presence and in the absence of antibiotic stress. This suggests that there are fundamental differences between the metabolisms of ampicillin-resistant and -susceptible E. coli which may be detected by means of VOC analysis. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Our findings suggest that VOC profiles may be utilized to differentiate between resistant and susceptible bacteria using just six compounds. Consequently, the development of machine-learning models using VOC signatures shows considerable diagnostic applicability for the rapid and accurate detection of antimicrobial resistance.

Indexed as

Escherichia coli InfectionsVolatile Organic CompoundsAcetoinAmpicillinAmpicillin ResistanceAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaEscherichia coliHumansIndolesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAcetoinAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsIndolesVolatile Organic Compoundsampicillinantimicrobial resistanceEscherichia coligas chromatography-mass spectrometrymetabolic profilingvolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID35835588
PMCPMC9804386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.