Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35835525›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2022

Women's experiences and expectations of intimate partner abuse identification in healthcare settings: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Evangelica Korab-Chandler, Minerva Kyei-Onanjiri, Jacqueline Cameron, Kelsey Hegarty, Laura Tarzia

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. What deters GPs from talking about sexual assault? a qualitative interview study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  6. Learn to Live Again: A Pilot Study to Support Women Experiencing Domestic Violence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Evangelica Korab-ChandlerDepartment of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Minerva Kyei-OnanjiriDepartment of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jacqueline CameronDepartment of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1253-1282
Kelsey HegartyDepartment of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Laura TarziaDepartment of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia laura.tarzia@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-0220-4985

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore women's experiences and expectations of intimate partner abuse (IPA) disclosure and identification in healthcare settings, focusing on the process of disclosure/identification rather than the healthcare responses that come afterwards.

designSystematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies DATA SOURCES: Relevant studies were sourced by using keywords to search the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, SocINDEX and ASSIA in September 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies needed to focus on women's views about IPA disclosure and identification in healthcare settings, use qualitative methods and have been published in the last 5 years. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Relevant data were extracted into a customised template. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research was used to assess the methodological quality of included studies. A thematic synthesis approach was applied to the data, and confidence in the findings was appraised using The Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research methods.

resultsThirty-four studies were included from a range of healthcare settings and countries. Three key themes were generated through analysing their data: (1)

conclusionsWomen in the included studies articulated a desire to routinely receive information about IPA, lending support to a universal education approach that equips all women with an understanding of IPA and options for assistance, regardless of disclosure. Women's suggestions for how to promote an environment conducive to disclosure and how to enquire about IPA have clear implications for clinical practice.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018091523.

Indexed as

Intimate Partner ViolenceMotivationDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansQualitative ResearchPUBLIC HEALTHQUALITATIVE RESEARCHQuality in health care

Identifiers

PMID35835525
PMCPMC9289017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.