Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35835477›Full record

Trial reportBMJ global health2022

The impact of a direct to beneficiary mobile communication program on reproductive and child health outcomes: a randomised controlled trial in India.

Amnesty Elizabeth LeFevre, Neha Shah, Kerry Scott, Sara Chamberlain, Osama Ummer, Jean Juste Harrisson Bashingwa, Arpita Chakraborty, Anna Godfrey, Priyanka Dutt, Rajani Ved and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03576157 (Impact Evaluation of Maternal Health Information Messaging in India), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03576157 nacompletednot on this map

Impact Evaluation of Maternal Health Information Messaging in India

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthRan2018 to 2021Enrolled5,095ConditionsBreast Feeding, Family Planning, Essential Newborn Care, Training of Frontline Health WorkersArmsKilkari
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Amnesty Elizabeth LeFevreUniversity of Cape Town, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Cape Town, South Africa aelefevre@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8437-7240
Neha ShahInternational Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9450-604X
Kerry ScottInternational Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3597-9637
Sara ChamberlainBBC Media Action, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4785-6482
Osama UmmerBBC Media Action, New Delhi, Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4189-5328
Jean Juste Harrisson BashingwaMRC/Wits-Agincourt Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, School of Public Health, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-1433-4397
Arpita ChakrabortyResearch and Evidence Practice, Oxford Policy Management, New Delhi, Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0515-3420
Anna GodfreyBBC Media Action, London, UK.
Priyanka DuttBBC Media Action, London, UK.
Rajani VedNational Health Systems Resource Centre, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Diwakar MohanInternational Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7532-366X
Kilkari Impact Evaluation Team
Johns Hopkins University · USAction for ME · GBGates Foundation · USUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDirect-to-beneficiary communication mobile programmes are among the few examples of digital health programmes to have scaled widely in low-resource settings. Yet, evidence on their impact at scale is limited. This study aims to assess whether exposure to mobile health information calls during pregnancy and postpartum improved infant feeding and family planning practices.

methodsWe conducted an individually randomised controlled trial in four districts of Madhya Pradesh, India. Study participants included Hindi speaking women 4-7 months pregnant (n=5095) with access to a mobile phone and their husbands (n=3842). Women were randomised to either an intervention group where they received up to 72 Kilkari messages or a control group where they received none. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and instrumental variable (IV) analyses are presented.

resultsAn average of 65% of the 2695 women randomised to receive Kilkari listened to ≥50% of the cumulative content of calls answered. Kilkari was not observed to have a significant impact on the primary outcome of exclusive breast feeding (ITT, relative risk (RR): 1.04, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.23, p=0.64; IV, RR: 1.10, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.81, p=0.71). Across study arms, Kilkari was associated with a 3.7% higher use of modern reversible contraceptives (RR: 1.12, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.21, p=0.007), and a 2.0% lower proportion of men or women sterilised since the birth of the child (RR: 0.85, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.97, p=0.016). Higher reversible method use was driven by increases in condom use and greatest among those women exposed to Kilkari with any male child (9.9% increase), in the poorest socioeconomic strata (15.8% increase), and in disadvantaged castes (12.0% increase). Immunisation at 10 weeks was higher among the children of Kilkari listeners (2.8% higher; RR: 1.03, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.06, p=0.048). Significant differences were not observed for other maternal, newborn and child health outcomes assessed.

conclusionStudy findings provide evidence to date on the effectiveness of the largest mobile health messaging programme in the world. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov; ID 90075552, NCT03576157.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneChild HealthBreast FeedingChildCommunicationFemaleHumansIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornMalePregnancychild healthimmunisationindividual randomized trialnutrition

Identifiers

PMID35835477
PMCPMC9288869
OpenAlexW4285403659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.