Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35835463›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurointerventional surgery2023

Thrombus imaging characteristics within acute ischemic stroke: similarities and interdependence.

Nerea Arrarte Terreros, Agnetha Ae Bruggeman, Manon Kappelhof, Manon L Tolhuisen, Josje Brouwer, Jan W Hoving, Praneeta R Konduri, Katinka R van Kranendonk, Bruna G Dutra, Heitor Cbr Alves and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Nerea Arrarte TerrerosDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands n.arrarteterreros@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-9912-7508
Agnetha Ae BruggemanDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6873-2545
Manon KappelhofDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5250-8955
Manon L TolhuisenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2695-1117
Josje BrouwerDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0301-2616
Jan W HovingDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3310-3973
Praneeta R KonduriDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Katinka R van KranendonkDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bruna G DutraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Heitor Cbr AlvesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4693-8278
Diederik Wj DippelDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9234-3515
Wim H van ZwamDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht UMC, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1631-7056
Ludo Fm BeenenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lonneke Sf YoDepartment of Radiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Ed van BavelDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Charles Blm MajoieDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henk A MarqueringDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
MR CLEAN Registry Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effects of thrombus imaging characteristics on procedural and clinical outcomes after ischemic stroke are increasingly being studied. These thrombus characteristics - for eg, size, location, and density - are commonly analyzed as separate entities. However, it is known that some of these thrombus characteristics are strongly related. Multicollinearity can lead to unreliable prediction models. We aimed to determine the distribution, correlation and clustering of thrombus imaging characteristics based on a large dataset of anterior-circulation acute ischemic stroke patients.

methodsWe measured thrombus imaging characteristics in the MR CLEAN Registry dataset, which included occlusion location, distance from the intracranial carotid artery to the thrombus (DT), thrombus length, density, perviousness, and clot burden score (CBS). We assessed intercorrelations with Spearman's coefficient (ρ) and grouped thrombi based on 1) occlusion location and 2) thrombus length, density and perviousness using unsupervised clustering.

resultsWe included 934 patients, of which 22% had an internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion, 61% M1, 16% M2, and 1% another occlusion location. All thrombus characteristics were significantly correlated. Higher CBS was strongly correlated with longer DT (ρ=0.67, p<0.01), and moderately correlated with shorter thrombus length (ρ=-0.41, p<0.01). In more proximal occlusion locations, thrombi were significantly longer, denser, and less pervious. Unsupervised clustering analysis resulted in four thrombus groups; however, the cohesion within and distinction between the groups were weak.

conclusionsThrombus imaging characteristics are significantly intercorrelated - strong correlations should be considered in future predictive modeling studies. Clustering analysis showed there are no distinct thrombus archetypes - novel treatments should consider this thrombus variability.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaCarotid Artery DiseasesIschemic StrokeStrokeThrombosisHumansThrombectomyTreatment OutcomeCTCT AngiographyStrokeThrombectomyThrombolysis

Identifiers

PMID35835463
PMCPMC10715487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.