Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35835137›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Oncology2022

Zandelisib with continuous or intermittent dosing as monotherapy or in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancy: a multicentre, first-in-patient, dose-escalation and dose-expansion, phase 1b trial.

John M Pagel, Jacob D Soumerai, Nishitha Reddy, Deepa Jagadeesh, Anastasios Stathis, Adam Asch, Huda Salman, Vaishalee P Kenkre, Alexia Iasonos, Judith Llorin-Sangalang and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. PI3K Inhibitors in Hematology: When One Door Closes….Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. PI3k Inhibitors in NHL and CLL: An Unfulfilled Promise.Blood and lymphatic cancer : targets and therapy · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

John M PagelSwedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jacob D SoumeraiMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Nishitha ReddyVanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Deepa JagadeeshCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Anastasios StathisOncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Universita della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
Adam AschStephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Huda SalmanStony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Vaishalee P KenkreUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA.
Alexia IasonosMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Judith Llorin-SangalangMEI Pharma, San Diego, CA, USA.
Joanne LiMEI Pharma, San Diego, CA, USA.
Andrew D ZelenetzMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: zeleneta@mskcc.org.
MEI Pharma (United States) · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCleveland Clinic · USEnte Ospedaliero Cantonale · CHMassachusetts General Hospital · USOklahoma State University Oklahoma City · USStony Brook University Hospital · USUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Translating Stress Response Targeted Therapy for B-Cell LymphomasP50CA192937 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI ZELENETZ, ANDREW D. · 2016 to 2020
$10.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA192937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhosphatidylinositol 3-kinase p110δ (PI3Kδ) inhibitors are efficacious in B-cell malignancies. Immune-related adverse events might be mitigated with intermittent dosing. We aimed to evaluate the safety and antitumour activity of zandelisib, a potent novel PI3Kδ inhibitor, with continuous or intermittent dosing as monotherapy or in combination with rituximab, in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancy.

methodsWe conducted a first-in-patient, dose-escalation and dose-expansion, phase 1b trial at ten treatment centres across Switzerland and the USA. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancy (limited to follicular lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukaemia during dose escalation) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and had received at least one previous line of therapy and no previous PI3Kδ inhibitor treatment. In the dose-escalation study, participants received oral zandelisib once daily (60 mg, 120 mg, or 180 mg; we did not evaluate four additional planned dose levels). The 60 mg dose was further evaluated as monotherapy or with intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m

findingsBetween Nov 17, 2016, and June 2, 2020, 100 patients were assessed for eligibility and 97 were enrolled and received zandelisib monotherapy (n=56) or zandelisib plus rituximab (n=41), with zandelisib administered on either a continuous schedule (n=38) or with intermittent dosing (n=59). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed, the objective of determining the maximum tolerated dose was abandoned, and antitumour activity was similar across the evaluated doses activity (objective responses in 11 [92%; 95% CI 61·5-99·8] of 12 patients at both 60 mg and 120 mg doses, and in five [83%; 95% CI 35·9-99·6] of six patients at 180 mg). With a median duration of exposure of 15·2 months (IQR 3·7-21·7), the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutrophil count decrease (ten [17%] of 59 patients in the intermittent dosing group and four [11%] of 38 in the continuous dosing group), diarrhoea (three [5%] and eight [21%]), pneumonia (one [2%] and six [16%]), alanine aminotransferase increase (three [5%] and two [5%]), and colitis (two [3%] and one [3%]). 26 (44%) of 59 patients in the intermittent dosing group and 29 (76%) of 38 patients in the continuous dosing group had grade 3-4 adverse events. Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in eight (21%) patients in the continuous dosing group and five (8%) patients in the intermittent dosing group. There were no treatment-related deaths.

interpretationZandelisib 60 mg once daily on an intermittent dosing schedule was safe, with low frequency of grade 3 or worse adverse events, warranting the ongoing global phase 2 and phase 3 trials.

fundingMEI Pharma.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellLymphoma, FollicularAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansMaximum Tolerated DoseProtein Kinase InhibitorsRituximabAngiogenesis InhibitorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsRituximab

Identifiers

PMID35835137
PMCPMC11870117
OpenAlexW4285018327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.