ArticlePloS one2022
A taxonomically representative strain collection to explore xenobiotic and secondary metabolism in bacteria.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- De-novo assembly of 82 bacterial genomes using Nanopore sequencing and prediction of biosynthetic capacity.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Computation-aided studies related to the induction of specialized metabolite biosynthesis in microbial co-cultures: An introductory overview.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacteria employ secondary metabolism to combat competitors, and xenobiotic metabolism to survive their chemical environment. This project has aimed to introduce a bacterial collection enabling comprehensive comparative investigations of those functions. The collection comprises 120 strains (Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Firmicutes), and was compiled on the basis of the broad taxonomic range of isolates and their postulated biosynthetic and/or xenobiotic detoxification capabilities. The utility of the collection was demonstrated in two ways: first, by performing 5144 co-cultures, recording inhibition between isolates and employing bioinformatics to predict biosynthetic gene clusters in sequenced genomes of species; second, by screening for xenobiotic sensitivity of isolates against 2-benzoxazolinone and 2-aminophenol. The co-culture medium of Bacillus siamensis D9 and Lysinibacillus sphaericus DSM 28T was further analysed for possible antimicrobial compounds, using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), and guided by computational predictions and the literature. Finally, LC-MS analysis demonstrated N-acetylation of 3,4-dichloroaniline (a toxic pesticide residue of concern) by the actinobacterium Tsukamurella paurometabola DSM 20162T which is highly tolerant of the xenobiotic. Microbial collections enable "pipeline" comparative screening of strains: on the one hand, bacterial co-culture is a promising approach for antibiotic discovery; on the other hand, bioremediation is effective in combating pollution, but requires knowledge of microbial xenobiotic metabolism. The presented outcomes are anticipated to pave the way for studies that may identify bacterial strains and/or metabolites of merit in biotechnological applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.